The Term " Maqboul" Acceptable as used by Ibn-Hajar and its Applications Upon The Hadith Narrators fromThe Second and Third Layers in The Four Books of Islamic Sunen

Abstract
This research addresses the Accepted Hadith term. This term is one of the terms of Al-Hafez Ibn Hajar in his book Al-Taqreeb . The research also examines the different reports by the reporters in the Four Sunan. Al-Hafez has determined the conditions of this term such as the absence of hadith. He also ranked it sixth among the different Taqreeb reporters. But Al-Hafez did not show his purpose behind this term, as a result, scholars have been divided into two teams. The first considered the accepted hadith which is reported by the reporter as being hasan (a hadith which is accepted by the majority of the Fuqaha) on its own. Others considered the hadith as hasan depending on others. Still, there are those who criticized this term. Through this research, the researcher concluded that Al-Hafez meant by the first condition that the reporter has little of hadith while in the second condition, he meant that the hadith is free of any Jarh or Ta'deel (Impingement and Validation). However, by deeply studying the reports of more than 287 different reporters, the researcher has found that the number of trusted reporters is only nine and the number of weak reporters is also eight , while the remaining 270 reporter are ignorant. Talking about mutaba'ah, which Al-Hafez did not abide by. The origion of the number of mutaba at for the hadeeth of the ignorant ( Majaheel ) reporter was (104). Seventeen of the them are correct mutaba at for seventeen reporters and another seventy one weak mutaba at for seventy-one reporters .There are also sixteen correct and weak mutaba at for sixteen reporters. This has been illustrated in special tables in the second chapter of the study. Regarding the decision about the accepted reporter (Maqboul), such reporter is considered ignorant and according to Ibn Hajar, this is the least of the degrees with respect to hadith reporting. Building on this, a hadith by an accepted (Maqboul) reporter is considered as weak and is never considered as correct even if it is provided with a correct mutaba'ah because it has a weak reporting. The fact that such hadith has weak reporting or that its reporter is weak has been the reason behind its weakness. Through this study, the research was able to observe the fact that 166 reporters deserve to be called Layyen Al-Hadith which means that their hadith is free from any mutaba'ah as Al-Hafez has stated in his book (Al-Taqreeb). Thus, the accepted reporter which has met the three conditions by Al-Hafez is the other side of the unknown reporter. Such reporter's hadith is considered weak even if it is provided with a correct mutaba'ah. The research has reached this through evidences, the different opinions by critics as well as studying more than 350 reports (Riwaya). The number of reporters that the researcher has studied in terms of Jarh and Ta'deel and with respect to their reports were 287 reporters. While the number of reporters that the researcher has studied in terms of Jarh and Ta'deel without studying their reports were 51 reporters, thus, the number of accepted reporters from the second and third rank is more than 337 reporters.
يختص هذا البحث ŲØŲÆŲ±Ų§Ų³Ų© مصطلح Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„ ŁˆŁ‡Łˆ من المصطلحات الخاصة بالحافظ ابن Ų­Ų¬Ų± في ŁƒŲŖŲ§ŲØŁ‡ ŲŖŁ‚Ų±ŁŠŲØ Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁ‡Ų°ŁŠŲØ, Ų«Ł…Ł‘ تخريج Ł…Ų±ŁˆŁŠŲ§ŲŖ ŁƒŁ„ Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁ قال عنه ابن Ų­Ų¬Ų± ( Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„ ) من كتب السنن الأربعة, ŁˆŁ‚ŲÆ Ų­ŲÆŲÆ الحافظ ؓروط Ų§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„Ų› من قلة Ų§Ł„Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ«ŲŒ ŁˆŲ£Ł† لا يثبت Ł…Ų§ يترك Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ«Ł‡ من أجله, ŁˆŲ£Ł† يتابع, ŁˆŲ¬Ų¹Ł„Ł‡ الحافظ في المرتبة السادسة من Ł…Ų±Ų§ŲŖŲØ رواة Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁ‚Ų±ŁŠŲØ, Ł„ŁƒŁ† الحافظ لم ŁŠŲØŁŠŁ‘Ł† مراده من هذا المصطلح, فانبرى Ł„Ų°Ł„Łƒ العلماؔ؛ فمنهم من Ų§Ų¹ŲŖŲØŲ± حديث Ų§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„ حسناً لذاته, ŁˆŁ…Ł†Ł‡Ł… من Ų§Ų¹ŲŖŲØŲ± Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ«Ł‡ حسناً Ł„ŲŗŁŠŲ±Ł‡ ŁˆŁŠŲ±ŲŖŁ‚ŁŠ بالمتابعات ŁˆŲ§Ł„Ų“ŁˆŲ§Ł‡ŲÆ, هذا من جهة, ŁˆŁ…Ł† جهة أخرى Ł‡Ł†Ų§Łƒ من ŁˆŲ¬Ł‡ انتقادات لاذعة لهذا المصطلح وخاصة صاحبي كتاب تحرير ŲŖŁ‚Ų±ŁŠŲØ Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁ‡Ų°ŁŠŲØ. ŁˆŁ…Ł† خلال البحث ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲÆŲ±Ų§Ų³Ų© ŲŖŁˆŲµŁ„ŲŖ ؄لى أنّ الحافظ قصد من الؓرط Ų§Ł„Ų£ŁˆŁ„ وصف Ų§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ بأنّه Ł‚Ł„ŁŠŁ„ Ų§Ł„Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ«, ŁˆŁ…Ł† الؓرط Ų§Ł„Ų«Ų§Ł†ŁŠ قصد Ų®Ł„ŁˆŁ‡ من الجرح ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲŖŲ¹ŲÆŁŠŁ„ŲŒ ŁˆŁ„ŁƒŁ† ŁˆŁ…Ł† خلال Ų³ŲØŲ± روايات (287) Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠŲ§Ų› وجدت أنّ Ų¹ŲÆŲÆ Ų§Ł„Ų±ŁˆŲ§Ų© الثقات منهم ( 9 ) رواة، وعدد Ų§Ł„Ų±ŁˆŲ§Ų© الضعفاؔ ( 8 ) رواة، ŁˆŁ…Ų§ تبقى من Ų§Ł„Ų±ŁˆŲ§Ų© ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲØŲ§Ł„Ųŗ عددهم ( 270 ) راويا هم Ł…Ų¬Ł‡ŁˆŁ„ŁˆŁ† ، هذا من Ų¬Ł‡Ų©ŲŒ ŁˆŲ£Ł…Ų§ بالنسبة لؓرط المتابعة -ŁˆŲ§Ł„Ų°ŁŠ لم ŁŠŁ„ŲŖŲ²Ł… به الحافظ- ŁŁƒŲ§Ł† أصل Ų¹ŲÆŲÆ المتابعات Ł„Ų£Ų­Ų§ŲÆŁŠŲ« Ų§Ł„Ų±ŁˆŲ§Ų© Ų§Ł„Ł…Ų¬Ų§Ł‡ŁŠŁ„ ( 104 ) Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų§ŲŖŲŒ منها (17) Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© صحيحة لسبعة Ų¹Ų“Ų± راويا، (71) Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© ضعيفة Ł„ŁˆŲ§Ų­ŲÆ ŁˆŲ³ŲØŲ¹ŁŠŁ† راويا، و(16) Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© صحيحة وضعيفة لستة Ų¹Ų“Ų± راويا، ŁƒŁ„ Ų°Ł„Łƒ Ų£ŁˆŲ¶Ų­ŲŖŁ‡ في Ų¬ŲÆŲ§ŁˆŁ„ Ų®Ų§ŲµŲ© في الفصل الثالث. ŁˆŲ£Ł…Ų§ بالنسبة لخلاصة Ų§Ł„Ł‚ŁˆŁ„ في Ų§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„ فالأصل ŁŁŠŁ‡ الجهالة ŁˆŁ‡ŁŠ عند ابن Ų­Ų¬Ų± أقل Ų§Ł„ŲÆŲ±Ų¬Ų§ŲŖŲŒ ŁˆŲØŁ†Ų§Ų” على Ų°Ł„Łƒ ŁŠŁƒŁˆŁ† حديث Ų§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„- Ų§Ł„Ł…Ų¬Ł‡ŁˆŁ„- ضعيفا ، ŁˆŁ„Ų§ ŁŠŲ±ŲŖŁ‚ŁŠ ŁˆŲ„Ł† توبع من Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© صحيحة لقلة Ų±ŁˆŲ§ŁŠŲŖŁ‡ŲŒ ŁˆŁ‡Ų°Ł‡ القلة ŁƒŲ§Ł†ŲŖ Ų³ŲØŲØŲ§ من Ų£Ų³ŲØŲ§ŲØ ضعفه ŁˆŲ¹ŲÆŁ… ؓهرته وسكوت العلماؔ على Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠŁ‡Ų§ أمثال سكوت Ų§Ł„ŲØŲ®Ų§Ų±ŁŠŲ› Ł…Ų¹ علمه ŲØŲ§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ ŁˆŲØŲ­ŲÆŁŠŲ«Ł‡ ŁˆŲØŲ§Ł„Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁŠ له ؄ن وجدت. ŁˆŲØŲ§Ł† Ł„ŁŠ من خلال الدراسة أنّ (166) Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠŲ§Ł‹ ŁŠŲ³ŲŖŲ­Ł‚ŁˆŁ† لفظ Ł„ŁŠŁ€Ł‘Ł† Ų§Ł„Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ« ، Ł„Ų®Ł„Łˆ Ų£Ų­Ų§ŲÆŁŠŲ«Ł‡Ł… من Ł…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų§ŲŖ أصلا ŁƒŁ…Ų§ نص الحافظ في مقدمة Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁ‚Ų±ŁŠŲØ: ŁˆŲ„Ł„Ų§ ŁŁ„ŁŠŁ€Ł‘Ł† Ų§Ł„Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ« ، ف؄ن أضفنا من توبع ŲØŁ…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© ضعيفة Ų²Ų§ŲÆ العدد قطعا. ؄ذن Ų§Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„ Ų§Ł„Ų°ŁŠ ŁˆŲ§ŁŁ‚ ؓروط الحافظ Ų§Ł„Ų«Ł„Ų§Ų«Ų©ŲŒ Ł‡Łˆ Ų§Ł„ŁˆŲ¬Ł‡ الآخر Ł„Ł„Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ł…Ų¬Ł‡ŁˆŁ„ŲŒ ŁˆŲ­ŁƒŁ… Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ«Ł‡ الضعف ŁˆŲ„Ł†Ł’ توبع ŲØŁ…ŲŖŲ§ŲØŲ¹Ų© صحيحة، ŲŖŁˆŲµŁ„ŲŖ Ł„Ų°Ł„Łƒ بالأدلة ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲØŲ±Ų§Ł‡ŁŠŁ†ŲŒ ŁˆŲ£Ł‚ŁˆŲ§Ł„ النقاد ŁˆŲµŁ†Ų§Ų¹ŲŖŁ‡Ł… Ų§Ł„Ų­ŲÆŁŠŲ«ŁŠŲ©ŲŒ وبدراسة وتخريج أكثر من (350) رواية. ŁˆŁƒŲ§Ł† Ų¹ŲÆŲÆ Ų§Ł„Ų±ŁˆŲ§Ų© Ų§Ł„Ų°ŁŠŁ† درستهم من Ł†Ų§Ų­ŁŠŲ© الجرح ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲŖŲ¹ŲÆŁŠŁ„ ودراسة Ų±ŁˆŲ§ŁŠŲ§ŲŖŁ‡Ł… (287)راويا، وعدد Ų§Ł„Ų°ŁŠŁ† ŲŖŁ… دراستهم من Ł†Ų§Ų­ŁŠŲ© الجرح ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲŖŲ¹ŲÆŁŠŁ„ ŲÆŁˆŁ† ŲÆŲ±Ų§Ų³Ų© Ł…Ų±ŁˆŁŠŲ§ŲŖŁ‡Ł… (51) راويا، ŁŁŠŁƒŁˆŁ† Ų¹ŲÆŲÆ Ų§Ł„Ų±ŁˆŲ§Ų© Ų§Ł„Ł…Ł‚ŲØŁˆŁ„ŁŠŁ† من الطبقة Ų§Ł„Ų«Ų§Ł†ŁŠŲ© ŁˆŲ§Ł„Ų«Ų§Ł„Ų«Ų© Ł‡Łˆ (337) Ų±Ų§ŁˆŁŠŲ§Ł‹, أو يزيد. ŁˆŲ§Ł„Ł„Ł‡ أعلم
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections