Teaching to Pass Exams Vs Teaching to Master Skills
Loading...
Date
2009-12-05
Authors
Dr. Abdul-Jabbar R. Khalili
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
<p>Year in and year out, exams remain the most reliable means of assessment of a student’s performance and achievement whether we are training the student to master skills or weare providing him with pure or theoretical knowledge. Although teachers are required to be faithful to the objectives set for the syllabi they deal with, they mostly design their teaching methods to serve other interests. Passing exams is crucial to the student to proceed from one level to another, graduate or start a business, and it is also essential to the instructor as one of the factors to measure his/her success at work. A major drawback of this concern in passing exams as the ultimate goal is that we focus more on a set of testing points only. We tend to ignore a more ambitious objective, developing skills and abilities essential for the student to succeed in school, college, the workplace, or in life in general. In this paper, I will contrast some aspects of the two approaches to teaching, one that focuses on exams as the end in the teaching process, and the other which stresses the importance of skills needed for passing exams and for succeeding in life after exams and college.</p>
<p>Year in and year out, exams remain the most reliable means of assessment of a student’s performance and achievement whether we are training the student to master skills or weare providing him with pure or theoretical knowledge. Although teachers are required to be faithful to the objectives set for the syllabi they deal with, they mostly design their teaching methods to serve other interests. Passing exams is crucial to the student to proceed from one level to another, graduate or start a business, and it is also essential to the instructor as one of the factors to measure his/her success at work. A major drawback of this concern in passing exams as the ultimate goal is that we focus more on a set of testing points only. We tend to ignore a more ambitious objective, developing skills and abilities essential for the student to succeed in school, college, the workplace, or in life in general. In this paper, I will contrast some aspects of the two approaches to teaching, one that focuses on exams as the end in the teaching process, and the other which stresses the importance of skills needed for passing exams and for succeeding in life after exams and college.</p>
<p>Year in and year out, exams remain the most reliable means of assessment of a student’s performance and achievement whether we are training the student to master skills or weare providing him with pure or theoretical knowledge. Although teachers are required to be faithful to the objectives set for the syllabi they deal with, they mostly design their teaching methods to serve other interests. Passing exams is crucial to the student to proceed from one level to another, graduate or start a business, and it is also essential to the instructor as one of the factors to measure his/her success at work. A major drawback of this concern in passing exams as the ultimate goal is that we focus more on a set of testing points only. We tend to ignore a more ambitious objective, developing skills and abilities essential for the student to succeed in school, college, the workplace, or in life in general. In this paper, I will contrast some aspects of the two approaches to teaching, one that focuses on exams as the end in the teaching process, and the other which stresses the importance of skills needed for passing exams and for succeeding in life after exams and college.</p>