تقويم كتب قواعد اللغة العربية في الصفوف العليا (ثامن، تاسع، عاشر) من وجهة نظر المعلمين والمعلمات في المدارس الحكومية في محافظة جنين

dc.contributor.advisor
dc.contributor.authorنعيم محمود صادق جرار
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T09:28:08Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T09:28:08Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed at the evaluating of the Arabic Grammar texts in the upper primary stage according to the point of view of female and male teachers in Jenin district during the scholastic year l997—98. The study tried to identify the evaluative estimations of teachers form three Arabic Grammar texts and the five dimensions involved, goals, content, methodology, Evaluative questions and artistic production. In addition to that the study aimed at identifying the evaluation level in all the above dimensions and also evaluation level for every questionnaire’s item, from the purpose of identifying the suitability of the three Arabic grammar books which are considered as very important tools in learning it also tried to identify and reveal the areas of strengths and weaknesses in them and be considered by the supervisors in change of text evaluation and planning. This study included all the males and females teachers in Jenin Secondary School teachers (409) during the academic scholastic year 97-98. The sample was taken randomly. (140) female and male teachers participated in the sty (80) male and (60) female teachers never taken from 50 secondary schools 28 for boys and 22 for girls. The instrument used in this study was a questionnaire prepared by the research. 66 item distributed among the five dimensions mentioned above.The consistency for the instrument was calculated using By raso equations and it was (.79). The study showed that the best dimension of the books is the fifth dimension which is the antistic production. the percentage was 75.8%, followed by presentation & style which was 74.6% the second dimension which was content that reached into 73% and flowed by the first dimensions (goals) which was 70%. Concerning the fourth dimension (evaluative questions) was the last level and reached to 69.6%. The study showed no significant differences in evaluating the Arabic grammar books in the form and production of evaluative questions. However there was significant difference between content and evaluative question in favor of long period experienced teacher (more than 10 years). Based on the above finding, the researcher recommended the following: Teachers provided with necessary should participate in curriculum construction and curriculum development. There should terms on glossary at the end or teaching units. The teacher book should be clear and an aid to the teacher in preparing and solvers exercises. The Teaching units should contain intensive structure- practice sentences.There should be more emphasis on emotional, psychological and physical goals. More classes should be assigned for each class. The distribution of books should be more balanced.en
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed at the evaluating of the Arabic Grammar texts in the upper primary stage according to the point of view of female and male teachers in Jenin district during the scholastic year l997—98. The study tried to identify the evaluative estimations of teachers form three Arabic Grammar texts and the five dimensions involved, goals, content, methodology, Evaluative questions and artistic production. In addition to that the study aimed at identifying the evaluation level in all the above dimensions and also evaluation level for every questionnaire’s item, from the purpose of identifying the suitability of the three Arabic grammar books which are considered as very important tools in learning it also tried to identify and reveal the areas of strengths and weaknesses in them and be considered by the supervisors in change of text evaluation and planning. This study included all the males and females teachers in Jenin Secondary School teachers (409) during the academic scholastic year 97-98. The sample was taken randomly. (140) female and male teachers participated in the sty (80) male and (60) female teachers never taken from 50 secondary schools 28 for boys and 22 for girls. The instrument used in this study was a questionnaire prepared by the research. 66 item distributed among the five dimensions mentioned above.The consistency for the instrument was calculated using By raso equations and it was (.79). The study showed that the best dimension of the books is the fifth dimension which is the antistic production. the percentage was 75.8%, followed by presentation & style which was 74.6% the second dimension which was content that reached into 73% and flowed by the first dimensions (goals) which was 70%. Concerning the fourth dimension (evaluative questions) was the last level and reached to 69.6%. The study showed no significant differences in evaluating the Arabic grammar books in the form and production of evaluative questions. However there was significant difference between content and evaluative question in favor of long period experienced teacher (more than 10 years). Based on the above finding, the researcher recommended the following: Teachers provided with necessary should participate in curriculum construction and curriculum development. There should terms on glossary at the end or teaching units. The teacher book should be clear and an aid to the teacher in preparing and solvers exercises. The Teaching units should contain intensive structure- practice sentences.There should be more emphasis on emotional, psychological and physical goals. More classes should be assigned for each class. The distribution of books should be more balanced.ar
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11888/6942
dc.titleتقويم كتب قواعد اللغة العربية في الصفوف العليا (ثامن، تاسع، عاشر) من وجهة نظر المعلمين والمعلمات في المدارس الحكومية في محافظة جنينen
dc.titleتقويم كتب قواعد اللغة العربية في الصفوف العليا (ثامن، تاسع، عاشر) من وجهة نظر المعلمين والمعلمات في المدارس الحكومية في محافظة جنينar
dc.typeThesis
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2840742.pdf
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: