Relationship between Narcissism and Innovation Among High School Students in Palestine's Northern Governorates
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Ghassan Al-Hilo | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Abd Elnser Al-Qaddoumi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nidal Ghannam Fayez Nayef | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-03T09:28:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-03T09:28:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aimed at identifying high school students level of both narcissism and innovation as well as the differences in the level of narcissism and innovation in the light of sex, major, place of living, school average variables. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher chose a sample of HOO students of both sexes distributed among the study variables. The sample chosen represented 5% of the .study population. The researcher administered to the sample the High School Student innovative Thinking Scale which covers four domains: Fluency, flexibility, originality and sensitivity to problems. lle also used Amons' Scale, to measure narcissism on four domains: leadership, authority, admiration of one self, talent, snobbery and nervousness. After testing validity and reliability, the researcher collected the data from the subjects of the study; then lie conducted an analysis of the results. Findings: The level of narcissism was found to be moderate: l. The percentages ofnarcissism level ranged between 67.2% and 67.6% on all secondary domains and on the total degree. 2. The level ofinnovative thinking was on average. Percentages of individuals responses ranged between 66.6% and 65%. 3. There were statistically significant differences at ot = 0.05 in all narcissism domains: authority, admiration of oneself talent, snobbery and nervousness. The total degree is attributed to the variable of specialization in favor of students belonging to the scientific stream. in the innovative thinking domain, there were differences on domain of originality in favor of scientific stream Students, However, no significant differences were found on the domains of innovative thinking and total degree: fluency, : flexibility, and sensitivity to problems. 4. There were statistically significant differences on the domains of pleadership, authority, self-admiration, nervousness and total degree; which may be due to the sex variable in favor of male students. However, no statistically significant differences were found on the domains of the innovative thinking scale; differences were found on the domain of originality in favor of females. No statistically significant differences were found on the secondary domains: flexibility, fluency, and sensitivity to problems and total 4 degree. 5-There were statistically significant differences on the narcissism domains: authority, talent, snobbery and total degree. These differences are attributed to variable of place living in favor of urban resident. No difference, however, were found on domain of self-admiration and nervousness. Pertaining to the domain of the innovative thinking scale, no statistically single-facing differences were found. 6. There were statistically significant differences on the domains of narcissism authority, self-admiration, nervousness and total degree; in favor of students whose achievement were 80% and higher. No differences we found on the domain of talent, snobbery and nervousness. Concerning Innovative Thinking Scale, differences were found on the domains of fluency,flexibility,and total degree favor of students whose averages were 80% and higher. However no differences were found on the domains of originally and sensitivity to problems. 7. No statistically significant correlation was found between narcissism and innovative thinking | en |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aimed at identifying high school students level of both narcissism and innovation as well as the differences in the level of narcissism and innovation in the light of sex, major, place of living, school average variables. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher chose a sample of HOO students of both sexes distributed among the study variables. The sample chosen represented 5% of the .study population. The researcher administered to the sample the High School Student innovative Thinking Scale which covers four domains: Fluency, flexibility, originality and sensitivity to problems. lle also used Amons' Scale, to measure narcissism on four domains: leadership, authority, admiration of one self, talent, snobbery and nervousness. After testing validity and reliability, the researcher collected the data from the subjects of the study; then lie conducted an analysis of the results. Findings: The level of narcissism was found to be moderate: l. The percentages ofnarcissism level ranged between 67.2% and 67.6% on all secondary domains and on the total degree. 2. The level ofinnovative thinking was on average. Percentages of individuals responses ranged between 66.6% and 65%. 3. There were statistically significant differences at ot = 0.05 in all narcissism domains: authority, admiration of oneself talent, snobbery and nervousness. The total degree is attributed to the variable of specialization in favor of students belonging to the scientific stream. in the innovative thinking domain, there were differences on domain of originality in favor of scientific stream Students, However, no significant differences were found on the domains of innovative thinking and total degree: fluency, : flexibility, and sensitivity to problems. 4. There were statistically significant differences on the domains of pleadership, authority, self-admiration, nervousness and total degree; which may be due to the sex variable in favor of male students. However, no statistically significant differences were found on the domains of the innovative thinking scale; differences were found on the domain of originality in favor of females. No statistically significant differences were found on the secondary domains: flexibility, fluency, and sensitivity to problems and total 4 degree. 5-There were statistically significant differences on the narcissism domains: authority, talent, snobbery and total degree. These differences are attributed to variable of place living in favor of urban resident. No difference, however, were found on domain of self-admiration and nervousness. Pertaining to the domain of the innovative thinking scale, no statistically single-facing differences were found. 6. There were statistically significant differences on the domains of narcissism authority, self-admiration, nervousness and total degree; in favor of students whose achievement were 80% and higher. No differences we found on the domain of talent, snobbery and nervousness. Concerning Innovative Thinking Scale, differences were found on the domains of fluency,flexibility,and total degree favor of students whose averages were 80% and higher. However no differences were found on the domains of originally and sensitivity to problems. 7. No statistically significant correlation was found between narcissism and innovative thinking | ar |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11888/6932 | |
| dc.title | Relationship between Narcissism and Innovation Among High School Students in Palestine's Northern Governorates | en |
| dc.title | العلاقة بين النرجسية والإبداع لدى طلبة الثانوية العامة في محافظات شمال فلسطين | ar |
| dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- relationship_between_narcissism_and_innovation_among_high_school_students_in_palestines_northern_governorates.pdf
- Size:
- 1.85 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: