QUINOLONE RESISTANCE AMONG ESCHERICHIA COLI AND KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE BACTERIA ISOLATED AT RAFIDIA AND AN-NAJAH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS IN NABLUS DISTRICT: PROSPECTIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-10-24
Authors
Khatatbeh, Marah
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
An-Najah National University
Abstract
Background: Among several bacterial genera, quinolone resistance has become more
prevalent in recent years. This was clear among common nosocomial pathogens such as
Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. While quinolones are a valuable part of the
current antimicrobial treatment options, growing quinolone resistance poses a threat to
their continued efficacy.
Objectives: First, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of resistance of E. coli
and K. pneumoniae to quinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) at two
major hospitals in Nablus District, Rafidia and An-Najah National University Hospital.
Second, the association of resistance to these antibiotics with various demographic and
clinical findings was examined. Third, mechanisms of quinolone resistance among E.
coli and K. pneumoniae were determined through resistance gene detection by PCR.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study design was selected. A total of 219 bacterial
isolates (169 isolates of E. coli and 50 isolates of K. pneumoniae) were collected from
the first of June 2023 to the last day of September 2023, from all patients infected with
those bacterial species. The included bacteria in this study were isolated from patients
admitted to the two mentioned Hospitals during the study period. Types of bacteria were
already identified by the VITEK 2 system (BioMérieux) in the two mentioned hospitals.
Resistance of the included bacteria to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was determined by
the disk diffusion method. In addition, multiplex PCR was used for detection of
resistant genes in order to determine quinolone resistance mechanisms among 118
resistant strains. The detected mechanisms and genes were target modification (qnrA,
qnrB, and qnrS genes), enzymatic modification (aac(6’)-Ib-cr gene), and efflux pump
mechanism (QepA, OqxA, and OqxB genes). Association of quinolone resistance with
clinical symptoms, demographic information, and other risk factors were evaluated.
Results: Relatively high frequencies of ciprofloxacin resistance (46.1%) and
levofloxacin resistance (47.9%) were found among E. coli isolates. Higher resistance
frequency of ciprofloxacin (70%) and levofloxacin (68%) among K. pneumoniae
isolates were detected. Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae ciprofloxacin resistant
bacteria isolated at An-Najah National University Hospital (60% and 92.9%,
respectively) were significantly higher (P= 0.000 and P= 0.001, respectively) than that
of the isolates obtained from Rafidia Hospital (37.3% and 40.9%, respectively).
Ciprofloxacin resistance among E. coli isolated from the general surgery unit was
significantly higher than that of the emergency ward (54.5%; P=0.002) and the
outpatients (36.9%; P= 0.016). However, E. coli levofloxacin resistance frequency in
the intensive care unit was significantly higher than that of the outpatients (49.2%;
P=0.018), emergency (45.5%; P=0.022), and general surgery (42.9%; P=0.037).
Escherichia coli isolation rate from urine (80%) was significantly higher than that of
wound swabs (76.3%; P=0.013). Furthermore, K. pneumoniae isolation rate from urine
(20%) was significantly higher than that of wound swabs (23.7%; P=0.036).
Escherichia coli ciprofloxacin resistance was significantly higher (P=0.008) in male
isolates (53.6%) than in female isolates (36.3%). Escherichia coli isolated from patients
over 65 years of age had the highest levofloxacin resistance frequency (62.5%), which
was also significantly (P= 0.007) higher than that of the 40–65-year age group.
Escherichia coli ciprofloxacin resistant bacterium isolated from patients with urinary
catheters (91.7%) had a significantly higher frequency than that of hypertension patients
(85.5%; P=0.013), diabetes mellitus patients (84.8%; P=0.017), cancer patients (81.9%;
P=0.022), and hepatic cirrhosis patients (64.1%; P=0.028). However, K. pneumoniae
ciprofloxacin resistant bacterium isolated from hepatic cirrhosis patients (77.8%) had a
significantly higher frequency than that of hypertension patients (65.2%; P=0.003),
cancer patients (61.9%; P=0.019), and diabetes mellitus patients (58.9%; P=0.032).
Frequency of levofloxacin resistant E. coli isolated from diabetes mellitus patients
(89.1%) was significantly higher than that of hypertension patients (76.3%; P=0.013),
cancer patients (73.6%; P=0.016), patient with the urinary catheter (77.8%; P=0.021),
and hepatic cirrhosis patients (51.3%; P=0.028). On the other hand, levofloxacin
resistant K. pneumoniae isolated from diabetes mellitus patients (71.8%) had a
significantly higher frequency than that of hypertension patients (56.5%; P=0.009),
cancer patients (52.4%; P=0.016), hepatic cirrhosis patients (59.3%; P=0.023), and
patient with the urinary catheter (48%; P=0.031). With respect to the quinolone
resistance mechanisms, the efflux pump among E. coli isolates was the most
predominant (43.3%) with OqxA (23.5%) being the most common gene, followed by
enzymatic modification by Aac(6’)-Ib-cr enzyme (29.6%) and target modification
mechanism (26%) in which the QnrS gene was the most common (13.6%). Similarly,
the efflux pump mechanism of quinolones resistance among K. pneumoniae isolates
was also the most common (37.8%) with the OqxA gene exhibiting the highest
frequency (27%), followed by enzymatic modification by Aac(6’)-Ib-cr enzyme
(32.4%) and target modification mechanism (29.7%) with QnrS and QnrB being the
most commonly detected genes (10.8%).
Conclusion: Our findings showed high rates of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin
resistance among E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, also a high percentage of the
efflux pump mechanism with OqxA being the most common gene, followed by
enzymatic modification by Aac(6’)-Ib-cr enzyme and target modification mechanism in
which the QnrS gene was the most common. We emphasize that it is necessary to
perform an antibiotic susceptibility test before choosing a prescription. Monitoring the
rates of resistance in the nations clinical facilities should be a greater priority for the
relevant government health departments.