.. . 2014 ..... "" .. ... .... . : . Declaration The work provided in this thesis, unless otherwise referenced, is the researcher's own work, and has not been submitted elsewhere for any other degree or qualification. :Student's Name :Signature: ::Date :1 2 6 7 8 9 11 11 12 :13 14 38 :51 52 52 52 54 54 56 57 58 58 :60 1.461 1.1.461 2.1.463 3.1.464 2.465 1.2.4).(65 2.2.4).(77 3.485 :87 1.588 1.1.588 2.1.590 3.1.593 2.597 98 110 Abstractb 153 256 357 462 563 664 7 )()(Independent T-Test 65 8 )()(Independent t-test 66 968 1069 1170 1271 1372 1474 15 )LSD( 75 16 )LSD( 76 17 )()(Independent T-Test 77 18 )()(Independent T-Test 78 1979 2080 2181 2282 2383 2484 2585 )1(111 )2(112 )3(119 )4( / 126 )5( / 127 )6(128 )7(131 )8(134 )9(136 .. . : . )2013/2014( )618()4.3(% )590( )4.11(%. )87( )()0.93( )0.95( )SPSS.( )4.39()0.46( )4.34( )0.41.( : . )=0.05( . )=0.05( :. )=0.05( : . : . . 1 2 : . . . . . . )2001.( 3 . )2002( . . )2003( . 4 . )2009( . )Hacker & Roberts, 2003( . 5 )2012( . . )2000( . )Bandura, 1995.( )2011.( )2007.( 6 ... __ . : (2008) . )2002(. )2008.( )2008.( 7 )2000.( .... : : . : : 1. 2. : 3. 8 4. : 5. : : :: 1. ( =0.05) . 2. ( =0.05) . 3. ( =0.05) . 4. ( =0.05) . 5. ( =0.05) . 9 : 1. ( =0.05) . 2. ( =0.05) . 3. ( =0.05) . 4. ( =0.05) . 5. ( =0.05) . : : : 10 . -- . : . : . : . 11 : : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . : : )(. : 2013/2014. : : . 12 : . : : . )( )Ron, 2014.( . :"") 2005:54(. : . : )2007.( : )2005.( . 13 14 : ... . : : )2002(. 15 )2002.( )1991( . )2002.( 16 )Welyam, 2007.( )2006.( . : )Ron, 2014( . )( . 17 . . . )2012( . )1999( . . )2006( . 18 )2005( . . . . . : . . . 19 : )2004.( ) 2010(. )2008( . )1997( : . )2000( . : )2002(: 20 1. . 2. : . 3. . 4. . 21 )2004(: 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 22 . : )1993.(" ) "1975.( .... )1997( . . )1998( . )2004( ." 23 ")2001: 12.(" ." . )1997.( . 24 : . . . ) : .( 25 . . : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 6. . 7. . 8. . )1990( : 1. . 2. . 26 : 1. : - . - . - . - . - . . )2008( 27 . . . . : 28 )2008.( : " ) "1997: 467.( )2002:389(" ." )2006( . . ...)Robbins, 1993( . 29 )2006( . )2002( : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 6. . )Vecchio, 1991( : .... . 30 . . : )Bandura, 1995( . )2011( . )Bandora, 1997( . 31 )Bandora, 1997( : . )(Bandora, 1993 . )Gailloll, 2000( . )2011( . )Anthomy & Artino, 2006( . )1993( . )Bandura, 1997( . 32 )Bandura, 1989( . . )Anthomy & Krisonis, 2007( . : : )Bandura, 1997.( : )Giallo & Little, 2003.( 33 : )Hoy, 2000.( : )Hoy, 2000.( . . )1997( : .... . 34 )Knoblauch, 2004( )Ross & Gray, 2004( . )2002( . . . . 35 : " : ) "2003:48.( )2003( : 1. . 2. 36 . 3. . )2000( : : . . 37 : )Gasone, 2006( : .... . . 38 : : :: )2012(" " " " " .)457( . )0.05=( . )2010(" " -" )115( 39 . . )21.( . )2010(" " )3311(")441(" )44()34( )4.0(" )4.05( ( =0.05) . )2010(" " 40 . )271(. . . (2009)" " (211) : . 41 (2003)" " .(658) . . (4.1): . . )1998(" " .)165( . 42 . : . . (1996)" " . (485) (78): . . 43 . , . (1990)" ". .(100) (Gordon) . . : (Gedikoglu & Keser, 2008):" " 2005- 2006 (3.6)(72%) . 44 )Huff, 2006("" . )Robertson, 1999(" " )( . )3.0( )3.94()3.5( 45 )3.5.( : )2013(" " )45( )2011/2012( . 80% 80% . )2012(" )(". )160( )80( )2010.( 46 )80( ( =0.05) . )2011(" " )401( " """" . )2011(" " .)401( 47 )Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk, 2001(. . . )2010( " " : )150( . . . (2009)" " )194( 48 . (2005)" " )200()50( . ( =0.05) . )2004(" " )302( . 49 . : )Voris, 2011(" )0-5(" )222( . (Thandi and Leon, 2010)" " )13( "KWa-Zuluu Natal" . . )Blackburn & Robinson, 2008( "" . )80(. 50 . )Jackson, 2005( )375( )1990Woolfolk &Hoy, ( . : 20131990 )50658( . 51 52 . : . : )14348( )2013/2014( . : : . )55( ).()618( )4.3(% )590( 53 )4.11%( : )1( % 29349.7 29750.3 52589.0 6511.0 510417.6 5-1014123.9 11-1513823.4 1520735.1 22938.8 34959.2 122.0 10718.1 11619.7 8414.2 589.8 6010.2 386.4 6310.7 6410.8 590100.0 )1()( . 54 : )2011()2009( )2003()Gedikoglue & Kaser, 2008( )92( ) )1(.( : : :. :)92( ) 8( )( (5) )((4) )( (3) )( )( )2009(. : : : )12()2( 55 )1()6()17()37()51( )87( )()5()((4) )( (3) )()( . : )Exploratory Factor Analysis()Principal Components Methods( )Varimax Method( )55( . )87()48() ()39()( )0.3( )8( 56 )9( . )87()7()2(: )2( :48 .17 .16 .7 . 8 :39 .17 .14 .8 87 )3( )2( )5( . : Cronbach’s Alpha(3) . 57 )3( 1:0.89 2:0.92 3:0.85 4: 0.86 0.93 5:0.91 6:0.94 7:0.87 .950 (3) )0.93()0.95( )0.85-0.92( )0.87-0.94( . : )SPSS( . 58 : : 1-: :)(. :)(. :)55-10 11-1515(. :)(. :) .( 2-: . : )(SPSS : 1. -(Cronbach's Alpha) . 2. . 59 3. )()One Sample T-Test( . 4. "" (Independent T-Test) :. 5. (One-Way ANOVA) :. 6. )LSD( . 7. )Pearson Correlation Coefficient( . 8. :. 60 1.4 2.4 3.4 61 . . 1.4 1.1.4 : ) 2012(: 4.21. 3.41-4.20. 2.61-3.40. 1.81-2.60. 1.81. )4(: 62 )4(: 1. : 4.530.40 2. : 4.510.480 3. : 4.380.543 4. : 4.100.66 4.390.46 )4.39()0.46( )4.10-4.53( )4.53()0.40( )4.10()0.66.( 63 2.1.4 : )2012( : )5( 1. : 4.440.52 2. :4.300.51 3. : 4.290.44 4.340.41 )4.34()0.41( )4.29-4.44( 64 )4.44()0.52( )4.29( )0.44.( 3.1.4 : )6(: )6( 4.400.44 0.57* *0.000 4.340.41 )6(0.000)( )0.05( )0.57()0.5( . 65 2.4 1.2.4)( : :"( =0.05) ". )( )(Independent T-Test)7(: )7()()(Independent T-Test )( * 2934.480.41 3.33-0.001* 2974.590.39 2934.320.56 2.61-0.009* 2974.430.51 2934.010.71 3.01-0.003* 2974.190.58 2934.470.47 2.11-0.035* 2974.560.47 2934.320.49 3.29-0.001* 2974.46 0.42 *=0.05 )7( ( =0.05) . 66 )0.001()0.05( . : " :( =0.05) ." )( )(Independent T-Test)8(: )8:()()(Independent t-test )( * 5254.530.41 0.71-0.47 654.570.32 5254.370.55 1.12-0.26 654.450.47 5254.090.66 0.22-0.82 654.120.64 5254.500.48 1.24-0.219 654.580.41 5254.380.47 0.90-0.366 654.440.40 67 )8( ( =0.05) )0.36( )0.05( . : " :( =0.05) ". )One Way ANOVA( )910(: 68 )9(: 5 1044.520.35 5-10 1414.510.45 11-15 1384.600.42 152074.520.37 5 1044.360.50 5-10 1414.310.60 11-15 1384.460.56 152074.380.49 5 1044.150.59 5-10 1414.110.70 11-15 1384.210.65 152074.160.61 5 1044.540.46 5-10 1414.460.55 11-15 1384.600.42 152074.500.43 5 1044.390.401 5-10 1414.350.51 11-15 1384.470.45 152074.390.41 )9( 11-15 )4.47(5-10 )4.35( )10( : 69 )10:( )( 0.240 1.39 0.22 0.68 3 0.16 96.45 586 97.13 589 0.160 1.69 0.49 1.49 3 0.29 172.61 586 174.11 589 0.610 0.60 0.24 0.74 3 0.41 240.47 586 241.21 589 0.298 1.22 0.50 1.50 3 0.21 128.86 586 130.36 589 0.168 1.69 0.34 1.02 3 0.20 118.14 586 119.16 589 )10(0.168)( )0.05( "( =0.05) ". : " :( =0.05) ". 70 )One Way ANOVA( )1112(: )11(: 2294.530.41 3494.540.39 124.480.56 2294.350.57 3494.400.50 124.240.89 2294.120.67 3494.190.60 123.940.97 2294.510.44 3494.530.48 124.530.57 2294.380.45 3494.410.43 124.300.72 )11( )4.41( )4.30( )12(: 71 )12(: )( 0.85 0.15 0.02 0.052 2 0.16 97.08 587 97.13 589 0.43 0.82 0.24 0.487 2 0.29 173.6 587 174.1 589 0.23 1.44 0.59 1.185 2 0.40 240.0 587 241.2 589 0.82 0.19 0.04 0.085 2 0.22 130.2 587 130.3 589 0.47 0.75 0.15 0.305 2 0.20 118.8 587 119.1 589 )12(0.47)( )0.05( :"( =0.05) ". : " :( =0.05) ". 72 )One Way ANOVA( )1314(: )13(: 107 4.55 .450 116 4.57 .400 84 4.47 .410 58 4.53 .330 60 4.51 .380 38 4.52 .420 63 4.59 .440 64 4.51 .340 107 4.38 .600 116 4.48 .470 84 4.24 .540 58 4.43 .430 60 4.40 .510 38 4.16 .580 63 4.46 .630 64 4.33 .480 107 4.26 .700 116 4.13 .630 84 3.96 .640 58 4.14 .530 73 60 4.10 .710 38 3.91 .650 63 4.36 .520 644.33 .510 107 4.47 .530 116 4.52 .490 84 4.47 .440 58 4.55 .420 60 4.49 .430 38 4.42 .530 63 4.55 .430 644.64 .400 107 4.42 .520 116 4.43 .450 84 4.28.440 58 4.41 .380 60 4.37 .470 38 4.25 .460 63 4.49 .390 644.45 .340 )13( )4.49()4.25( )14(: 74 )14(: * )( 0.651 0.72 0.12 0.83 7 0.16 96.29 582 97.13 589 0.010 2.60 0.75 5.27 7 0.29 168.80 582 1.17 589 0.000 4.16 1.64 11.49 7 0.39 71.99 582 241.20 589 0.220 1.34 0.29 2.07 7 0.22 128.20 582 130.30 589 0.099 2.03 0.40 2.84 7 0.20 116.30 582 119.10 589 *)=0.05( )14( )() ( )0.09( )0.05( :"( =0.05) ". )LSD()15 16(: 75 )15:()LSD( 0.0880.158*0.162*0.140*0.170*0.034-0.082 0.06920.07150.05520.08930.124-0.06- 0.00220.014-0.02000.19-*0.07- 0.01-0.01730.19-*0.07- 0.03460.17-*0.06- 0.213*0.09- 0.116 . . 76 )16:()LSD( 0.0520.00700.04750.06*0.022-0.07740.027 0.04-0.05-0.059-0.07-0.02450.02- 0.04050.013-0.029*0.08500.020 0.054-0.069-0.029*0.02- 0.015-0.08440.033 0.099*0.049 0.05- . 77 2.2.4)( : " :( =0.05) ." )( )(Independent T-Test)17(: )17()()(Independent T-Test )( 2934.240.47 2.76-0.06 2974.340.42 2934.280.52 1.15-0.248 2974.330.50 2934.420.49 0.915-0.360 2974.460.55 2934.310.43 1.86-0.063 2974.37 0.41 )17( ( =0.05) )0.06( )0.05( : 78 ( =0.05) . : " :( =0.05) ". )()(Independent T-Test )18(: )18()()(Independent T-Test )( * 5254.290.88 0.189-0.850 654.300.78 5254.310.76 0.8090.419 654.250.79 5254.440.87 0.76-0.939 654.450.76 5254.350.87 0.2300.818 654.33 0.45 )18( ( =0.05) )0.81()0.05( 79 :( =0.05) . : " :( =0.05) ". )One Way ANOVA( )1920(: )19(: 5 1044.280.44 5-10 1414.270.45 11-15 1384.350.42 152074.260.45 5 1044.340.48 5-10 1414.260.55 11-15 1384.360.49 152074.270.51 5 1044.500.39 5-10 1414.470.51 11-15 1384.450.65 152074.400.49 5 1044.370.38 5-10 1414.330.44 11-15 1384.390.41 152074.310.41 80 )19( 1115 15 )20(: )20(: )( 0.25 1.35 0.27 117.85 586 0.20 118.66 589 0.91 3 0.32 1.15 0.30 154.51 586 0.26 155.42 589 0.82 3 0.39 0.98 0.27 162.40 586 0.27 163.22 589 0.57 3 0.34 1.11 0.19 101.42 586 0.17 102.00 589 117.85 586 )20(0.34)( )0.05( "( =0.05) " . 81 : " :( =0.05) ". )One Way ANOVA( )2122(: )21(: 2294.300.42 3494.280.46 124.410.46 2294.270.52 3494.320.50 124.470.55 2294.360.38 3494.330.43 124.520.43 2294.510.44 3494.400.57 124.690.34 )21( "" "" )22(: 82 )22(: * )( 0.53 0.63 0.127 0.25 2 0.202 118.40 587 118.60 589 3.33 1.102 0.291 0.58 2 0.264 154.80 587 155.40 589 0.11 4.485 0.259 0.51 2 0.173 101.40 587 102.00 589 0.24 1.49 1.228 2.45 2 0.274 160.70 587 163.20 589 )22(0.24)( )0.05(: "( =0.05) " . : " :( =0.05) ". )One Way ANOVA( )2324(: 83 )23(: 1074.370.46 1164.290.46 844.220.42 584.210.43 604.230.46 384.200.52 634.410.40 644.290.38 1074.360.57 1164.230.55 844.360.44 584.290.45 604.250.54 384.340.50 634.310.51 644.300.44 1074.470.57 1164.420.50 844.460.43 584.420.68 604.480.49 384.490.44 634.390.53 644.440.49 1074.400.45 1164.310.44 844.340.38 584.310.42 604.320.44 384.340.45 634.370.36 644.350.33 84 )23( "" )4.40("""" )4.31( )24( : )24(: )( 0.06 1.15 0.42 2.99 7 0.19 115.60 582 118.60 589 0.58 0.80 0.21 1.48 7 0.26 153.90 582 155.40 589 0.96 0.27 0.07 0.53 7 0.28 162.60 582 163.20 589 0.82 0.51 0.08 0.62 7 0.17 101.30 582 102.00 589 )24( 0.82)()0.05( :" ( =0.05) ". 85 3.4 :/ )56( )590( )9.49(%. )25(: )25( % 1.1119.64 2.916.07 3.814.29 4712.50 5.58.93 6.47.15 7.47.15 8.47.15 9.35.36 10.35.36 11.23.58 12.23.58 13.23.58 14.11.79 15.11.79 )25( 86 )19.64(%) ()16.07(% )14.29(% )12.50.(% )1.79(% )1.79.(% 87 1.5 2.5 88 . 1.5 1.1.5 :: )4.39()0.46( . . 89 . . "". . : )4.34()0.41( 90 ) ( . . . 2.1.5: ( =0.05) . )6( ( =0.05) 91 )2005( )2010( )2010()1996()1990( . ( =0.05) . )7( )=0.05( . )2010()1996()1990( . ( =0.05) . )9( ( =0.05) . 92 )2010()1990( )1996( . ( =0.05) . )11( ( =0.05) . ( =0.05) . )13( ( =0.05) )2010( . 93 3.1.5: ( =0.05) . )17( ( =0.05) )2010( )2011()2008( )2009( )2005(. ( =0.05) . )17( ( =0.05) 94 )2010( )2004( . ( =0.05) )20( ( =0.05) , " )2005( )2011( . 95 ( =0.05) . )22( ( =0.05) )2010( )2009( . ( =0.05) . )24( ( =0.05) . 96 )=0.05( . )25( . 97 2.5: : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 6. . : 1. . 2. . 3. . 98 : : 99 : )2005(. . )2002.( . )1975.( . )2011.( )()38()1(222-237. )2010.( )18(115-150. )2006.( . )2003.( . )1991.( 1. 100 )2000(.: . )2002.( . )2006.(:: . )2007( )1()36(110-117. )2013.( )9()4(419-433. )2006.( : -)23()2(240-266. )2006.(... . )2008.( . 101 )2009.( )( )13()2(122-149. )2007.( )()21()4(. )1998.( . )2011.( )25( )1(1-24. )2002.(- 1. )2004.( . )2002.( )41(5-33. )1990.( . 102 )2009.("" " "10/10/2009. )2006.( . )2008.( . )2010.( . )2005.(2. )2003.( . )1993.( )3(461-487. )2012.( )28( )2(453-489. )2006.(3 . 103 )2001.(1 . )1999.( )()13( )2(560-595. )2004.( . )2000.( )14()1( 210-220. )1998.( . )2003.( )( -)16()2( 231-273. )1993.(1 . )2004.( . 104 )2012(. . )2010.( : . )2002.( . )1997.( . )2004.(1 . )2012.( )( . )12.( )2010(. "- )26(2010273-322. )2002.(.2: . 105 )2008.(1. )1997.( . )1997.( . )2007.( )8()4(69-89. )2005.( . )2001.(2 . )2010.( )1()1( 199-227. )2005.( . )2000.( . 106 )2008.( "":27/04/1429: http://www.manhal.net/articles.php?action=show&id=579 )2005.()2005-2015( . )2009.( . : Anthony, T. & Kritsonis, W. (2007). “A mixed methods assessment of the effectiveness of strategic e mentoring in improving the self efficacy and persistence (or retention) of alternatively certified novice teachers within an inner city school”. District Doctoral Forum, National Journal for Publishing and Monitoring Doctoral Student Research. (1) 1-8. Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of Cognitive Processes Through Perceived Self – Efficacy. DevelopmentalPsychology, 25(5), pp. 729-735. Bandura, A. (1995). Self- Efficacy in Changing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bandura, A. (1997). Self- Efficacy The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. http://www.manhal.net/articles.php?action=show&id=579 107 Bandora, A.(2001) "social cognitive theory. Anagetic perspective. Annual Review o psychology. Blackburn, J. Robinson , S.(2008) Assessment of teacher self – efficacy and job satisfaction of early career Kentucky agriculture teacher . Journal of Agricltural Education .3 (49) .1-11. Gedikoglu, T & Keser, Z. (2008). “Determining the extent to which high school principals exercise their authority and responsibility”. International Journal of Human Sciences, Vol. 5, No 2, pp :2-23. Giallo, R., & Llittle, E. (2003). Classroom Behavior Problems, The Relationship between Preparedness, Classroom Experiences and Self-Efficacy in Graduate and Student Teachers. Australian Journal of Educational & DevelopmentalPsychology, Vol(3), Issue (1), pp. 21-34. Hacker, Stephen & Roberts, Tammy (2003). Transformational leadership: creating organizations of meaning, American Society for Quality, Quality Press, USA. Hoy, A. (2000). Changes in Teacher Efficacy during the Early Years of Teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American EducationalResearch Association, New Orleans: LA. pp. 1-26. Huff, J. (2006). Measuring a leader’s practice: Past efforts and present opportunities to capture what educational leaders do. Paper 108 presented at the annual meeting of the America, Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Jackson , D. (2005). An exploration of the relationship between teacher efficacy and classroom management styles in urban middle schools . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wayne state university . Detroit. Michigan. Knoblauch, D. (2004). Contextual Factors and the Development of Student Teachers Sense of Efficacy, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation.Ohaio: Ohio State University. Robbins, Stephen (1993). Organizational Behavior: Concepts Controversies and Applications, 6th Edition, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englwood, Cliffs, N.J. Robertson, K. (1999 ). Classroom and Behavior Management, U.S.A: university of new Orleans. Ron, Coffen (2014). Positive Practice: Skill Building for appropriate behaviors. Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Ross, J. & Gray, P. (2004). TransformationalLeadership and Teacher Commitment to Organizational Values, The Mediating Effects of Collective Teacher Efficacy. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego. Thandi, N. & Leon, P. (2010). A Key Dimensions of Effective Leadership for Change: A Focus on Township and Rular Schools in South 109 Africa, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, Vol. (38), Issue (2), p 207-228. Vecchio, Robert (1991). Organizational Behavior, 2nd Edition, The Dryden Press, NY. Voris, B. (2011). Teacher Efficacy, Job Satisfaction, and Alternative Certification in Early Career, Special Education Teachers, Abstract of Disseration, College of Education, University of Kentucky. Welyam, Jems (2007) .Professional Leadership in schools, Cojan Badej. 110 )1( )2( )3( )4(/ )5(/ )6( )7( )8( )9( 111 )1( / 1.. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.. 11. 12. 112 )2( /............................................/ " " . . _________________________________________________________ : : : :55- 1011- 15 :)(( ) : 113 :( ). : : 1. 2. . 3. 4. . 5. 6. . 7. 8. . 9. 10. . 11. . 12. 13. . 14. 15. . 16. 114 17. . 18. . 19. . 20. . : 21. . 22. . 23. . 24. . 25. . 26. . 27. . 28. . 29. . 30. . 31. . : 115 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. . 38. . 39. 40. . 41. . 42. . 43. . : 44. . 45. 46. . 47. 116 48. . 49. . 50. . : : 51. . 52. 53. 54. . 55. . 56. . 57. . 58. : 59. . 60. . 61. 62. 63. 117 64. . 65. : 66. . 67. . 68. . 69. . 70. . 71. . 72. . 73. : 74. 75. . 76. . 77. 78. . 79. 80. 81. 82. 118 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. . 92. __________________________________________________________ 15 . . __________________________________________________________ 11-15 / __________________________________________________________ )3( ............................................/ __________________________________________________________ 5-10 119 ............................................ " __________________________________________________________ . ............................................ " __________________________________________________________ 5 15 ............................................ . __________________________________________________________ : : : : /............................................ " __________________________________________________________ : : : : __________________________________________________________ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 120 :)( : : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 6. . 7. . 8. . 9. . 10. . 11. . 12. . 13. . 14. . 121 15. . 16. . 17. . : 18. . 19. . 20. . 21. . 22. . 23. . 24. . 25. . 26. . 27. . 28.. 29. . 30. . 31. 122 . 32. . 33. . : 34. . 35. . 36. . 37. . 38.. 39. . 40. . : 41. . 42. . 43. . 44. . 45. . 46. . 47. 123 . 48. . : : 49. . 50. . 51. . 52. . 53. . 54. . 55. . 56. . 57. . 58. . 59. . 60. . 61. . 62. . 63. . 64. . 65. . 124 : 66. . 67. . 68. . 69. . 70. . 71. . 72. . 73. . 74. . 75. . 76. . 77. . 78. . 79. . : 80. . 81. . 82. . 83. 125 . 84. . 85. . 86. . 87. . 88. / 1. 2. 3. 126 )4( / 127 )5( / 128 )6( %% 1..0.581 20.65220.652 2. . 0.515 3. . 0564 4. . 0.565 5. . 0.685 6..0.681 7. . 0.728 8. . 0.735 9. . 0.446 10. . 0.604 11. . 0.684 12. . 0.613 13. . 0.778 14. . 0.749 129 15. . 0.698 16. . 0.594 17. . 0.601 18. . 0.701 19.92940.580 19. . 0.816 20. . 0.523 21. . 0.440 22. . 0.576 23. . 0.534 24. . 0.663 25. . 0.768 26. . 0.751 27. . 0.727 28..0.705 29. . 0.586 30. . 0.688 31. . 0.839 130 32. . 0.794 33. . 0.550 34. . 0.635 14.76455.344 35. . 0.778 36. . 0.749 37. . 0.714 38..0.613 39. . 0.690 40. . 0.805 41. . 0.553 11.65967.003 42. . 0.647 43. . 0.506 44. 0.660 45. . 0.696 46. . 0.632 47. . 0.640 48. . 0.778 131 )7( %% 49.. 0.643 27.90027.900 50.. 0.627 51. . 0.573 52..0.760 53..0.730 54..0.731 55. . 0.541 56..0.654 57. . 0.725 58. . 0.792 59..0.842 60..0.785 61. . 0.699 62. . 0.631 63. . 0.692 64. . 0.666 65. . 0.678 132 66..0.689 22.89750.797 67. . 0.606 68. . 0.537 69. . 0.704 70. . 0.851 71. . 0.799 72.. 0.792 73.. 0.684 74. . 0.715 75. . 0.631 76. . 0.649 77..0.728 78..0.571 79..0.322 80. . 0.653 17.89768.694 81. . 0.527 82. . 0.589 83. . 0.767 84. . 0.708 85..0.732 133 86. . 0.800 87. . 0.622 134 )8( 1234 Q30.581 Q180.515 Q190.564 Q200.656 Q220.685 Q230.681 Q240.728 Q250.735 Q260.446 Q290.604 Q300.684 Q430.613 Q440.778 Q450.749 Q460.698 Q470.594 Q480.601 Q10.701 Q2 0.816 Q40.523 Q50.440 Q60.576 Q70.534 Q80.663 Q90.768 Q100.751 Q110.727 Q120.705 Q130.586 Q140.688 135 Q150.839 Q160.794 Q170.550 Q210.635 Q280.778 Q310.749 Q340.714 Q350.613 Q360.690 Q380.805 Q270.553 Q320.647 Q330.506 Q370.660 Q390.696 Q400.632 Q410.640 Q420.778 22.044.063.672.39 20.6519.9314.6411.66 136 )9( 123 Q490.643 Q580.627 Q620.573 Q740.760 Q750.730 Q760.731 Q770.541 Q780.654 Q790.725 Q800.792 Q810.842 Q820.785 Q830.699 Q840.631 Q850.692 Q860.666 Q870.678 Q510.689 Q60 0.606 Q610.537 Q630.704 Q640.851 Q650.799 Q660.792 Q670.684 Q680.715 Q690.631 Q700.649 Q710.728 Q720.571 137 Q730.322 Q500.653 Q520.527 Q530.589 Q540.676 Q550.708 Q560.732 Q570.800 Q590.622 21.873.141.78 27.9022.9017.90 An –Najah National University Faculty of Graduate Studies The Degree of Positive Practices among Governmental Schools Principals and it's Relationship with Teachers' self Efficiency from the Teachers Point of View at the North Directorates of the West Bank by Nasreen Mohammad Abedel Fattah Salameh Supervised Prof. Abed Assaf This Thesis is Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Educational Administration, Faculty of Graduate Studies, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. 2014 b The Degree of Positive Practices among Governmental Schools Principals and it's Relationship with Teachers' self Efficiency from the Teachers Point of View at the North Directorates of the West Bank Prepared by Nasreen Mohammad Abedel Fattah Salameh Supervised by Prof. Abed Assaf Abstract This study aimed at investigating positive practices for principals at governrmantal schools' and it's relation with self efficiency of teachers in north West Banks Govermentes from Teachers Point of view. It also aimed at investigating the effect of the variables of the study at the level of ( =0.05) due to (Gender, qualification, years of experience, specialization, and directorate) on the administrative Practices for the principals at public schools and its relation with self efficiency for teachers in north west banks directorates from teachers' point of view. The population of the study consisted of teachers in governmental schools in North West bank directorates for the academic year (2013/2014), the researcher selected a stratified random sample that consisted of (618) teachers formed (4.3%) of the study population, the final sample was consisted of (590) teachers by (4.11%) of the all population. To achieve the purpose of the study, the researcher constructed a questionnaire that is consisted of (87) items and divided to two domains based on previous studies and related studies. To ensure its validity the researcher used (Cronbach Alfa) coefficient, and the consistency were (0.95) for the first domain related to positive practices of principals, and (0.93) for the second domain related to teachers' efficiency, c which are a high degree of stability and consistency, then data were analyzed by the statistical program (SPSS). The results of the study showed that the total degree for positive practices for principals at governmental Schools and its relationship with self efficiency for teachers (4.39) which it is very high according to the scale prepared for this study. The results of the study also show that: 1. There is a positive correlation between the positive practices and teachers' self-efficiency in governmental schools in the directorates of northern West Bank. 2. There are significant differences at the level ( =0.05) between the means responses of the respondents on the positive practices for principals at governmental schools in the directorates of northern West Bank due to the gender, and it refer to female. 3. There are no significant differences at the level ( =0.05) between the means responses of the respondents on the positive practices for principals at governmental schools in the directorates of northern West Bank due to the variables: academic qualification, years of experience, specialization, and the directorates. 4. There are no significant differences at the level ( =0.05) between the means responses of the respondents on teachers' self-efficiency from their point of view at governmental schools in the directorates of northern West Bank due to the variables: gender, academic qualification, years of experience, specialization, and the Directorate. d According to the findings of the study results, the researcher recommended a set of recommindatios, including: 1. The importance of emphasizing on the experience standard in choosing the principals of schools in administration. 2. The necessity of training teachers on using the most modern teaching devices and tools to be able to use it in learning process. This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.win2pdf.com. The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only. This page will not be added after purchasing Win2PDF. http://www.win2pdf.com