Applying active learning approach in engineering labs assessment and methodology development Walaa Al-Johari Hala Abu Shaqam Sajeda Shtya Abeer Khaled Supervisor : Dr. Hussam Arman Outline : Comparison between passive and active learning Approaches of learning Projects goals and motivations Sample size & Questionnaire Safety lab Groups of the project New Techniques Evaluation of the project Feed back Recommendation Dr. hussam Teaching vs. learning Comparison between passive and active learning Face to face learning Self based learning Online Collaborative Learning Approaches of learning Constructivism approach Self learning approach Problem based learning Problem based learning Self learning approach Self learning approach Corporative learning Games Quizzes Projects goals and motivations Assessment survey Sample size calculation Questionnaire modeling Questionnaire analyses Sample size calculation 106 107 108 109 Department/year 14 26 24 27 Civil 4 5 5 5 Architectural 6 10 6 4 Electrical 4 6 4 4 Chemical 6 7 6 5 Industrial 5 5 5 5 Computer 6 11 7 7 Mechanic 0 2 6 5 Mechatronics 7 10 9 8 Building 0 0 4 4 Communication Questionnaire modeling -What things we want to assess. General satisfaction Lab readability Course material Lab hours Problems -Questionnaire and sample type. Questionnaire analyses Teaching hour satisfaction Methods of teaching Comprehension and connects theoretical with practical Needs for extra means The comfort of labs conditions باعتقادك ادوات المختبرات وبيئة العمل وظروفه مناسبة ومريحة القسم الذي ينتمي اليه الطالب نعم دائماً نعم في بعض المختبرات لا العدد النسبة العدد النسبة العدد النسبة صناعي 1 4% 19 79% 4 17% ميكانيك 4 13% 24 77% 3 10% مدني 9 10% 69 76% 13 14% ميكاترونيكس 1 8% 12 92% - - اتصالات - - 7 88% 1 13% كهرباء - - 18 69% 8 31% حاسوب 1 5% 16 80% 3 15% معماري - 14 74% 5 26% بناء 1 3% 27 79% 6 18% كيماوي 3 17% 12 67% 3 17% Safety lab (case study) Why? Collective decision Good condition 2 groups (criteria) 2 equivalent groups number age, gender and average GPA Students Control group Classic group Experiment Selection Muscle Fatigue Test. Flue Gas Analysis. Air Quality assessment. New Techniques Preparation 1- Facebook account and email 2- Multimedia 3- Full Arabic description. 4- Quizzes 5- Sheet for Theoretical and practical Information 6- Websites 7-Home ,class Activities 8- Competing questions Methods that follows to evaluate Control group: 1)Questioner Methods that follows to evaluate Control group (cont): 2) Mid term exam. The comparison between marks of tow groups: Comparision marks control group 29.5 24.5 30 27.5 30 32 26 30 32 31 classic group 22.5 22.5 24.5 26.5 27.5 27 27.5 28.5 30.5 31 Student Number Marks The feed back for control group taken by: Questioner. Mid term exam. Face book. The students of control group themselves. Recommendations Promote students learning and encourage dialogue with self . Take students Psychological factors . Make use of internet and website. Connected the theoretical part with the practical. Enhance the relations between students and their teachers. Utilization of friends grouping policy in the class. image2.png image3.gif image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image13.jpeg image14.jpeg image15.jpeg image16.png image17.jpeg image18.jpeg image19.jpeg image20.wmf image21.jpeg image22.jpeg image23.png image24.png image25.png image26.wmf image27.jpeg image28.gif image29.jpeg image30.png image31.png /docProps/thumbnail.jpeg