Energy Aware 
Software Defined 
Radio system  using
 USRPs 




Reem Balatiah 

Waseem Jaber
Hanadi Salman 


Team Work 

Dr. Yousef Dama
Dr. Ahmed Al-Masri
Supervisors 






CONTENTS 
THE BEGINNING POINT

PROJECT IDEA

PRACTICAL EXPERIMENT

RESULTS 







Traditional Energy






Fossil Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Coal 







Renewable Energy






Solar Energy
Hydropower Energy
Geothermal Energy
Biomass Energy
Wind Energy





1


2


3


4
Green Telecom Network 
Green Telecom Equipment 
Safe Telecom Waste Disposal
Design of Green Central Office Buildings
Green of Telecom















DG
Diesel Generator 
with fixed power



SE
Solar 
Energy
with variable  power















Disadvantages of Diesel Generator 
Cost of fossil fuels is on increase !
High quantity of carbon emissions from diesel generators.
Many of them are in remote locations or difficult accessible places. 





1


2


3


4


5





reduce the cost of operations of the telecom network.
expand network into rural areas
Renewable energy technology becoming available 
create sustainable businesses 
reduces carbon emissions and helps us to be environmentally friendly. 
Advantages of Green system 




Average monthly solar energy – KWh/m  (2011)
2
Graph 1



Daily solar radiation of typical summer day
Graph 2


4.1666666666666664E-2	8.3333333333333329E-2	0.125	0.16666666666666666	0.20833333333333334	0.25	0.29166666666666669	0.33333333333333331	0.375	0.41666666666666669	0.45833333333333331	0.5	0.54166666666666663	0.58333333333333337	0.625	0.66666666666666663	0.70833333333333337	0.75	0.79166666666666663	0.83333333333333337	0.875	0.91666666666666663	0.95833333333333337	0	0	0	0	0	20	135	343	532	774	905	1019	1062	1000	917	776	585	371	156	20	0	0	0	0	0	

TIME

QUALITY

Telecom System 



Solar Energy with Variable Power



Adaptive Coding and Modulation 




The idea of   our Project 



SNR
Rx
Tx
Po  , QPSK





SNR Estimation





Practical Experiment 


Equipment  and Specifications





USRP N200
Wight(Kg)

1.2
DC input (V)
6
Current consumption(A)

1.3
ADC Sample Rate(MS/s)

100
DAC Sample Rate(MS/s)

400






VERT2450
Operating Frequency(GHz)

2.4-5.85
Antenna Type : Dipole

 
Gain (dBi)

2
Connector : SMA

 







XCVR2450
Wi-Fi Standard : 802.11n

 
Max. Speed (Mbps)

150
Frequency (GHz)

2.4& 5



16


BER Performance of QPSK and 8-PSK






Connection 



The comparison between BER performance for F=2.415GHz  at  different distances for QPSK.

Graph 1


QPSK / F=2.415GHz
D=3	5	10	15	20	2.5333105432037244E-2	5.9803527187128102E-3	3.1024042274244148E-3	2.1692542597957823E-3	D=2	5	10	15	20	1.8191428571428591E-2	4.9850793650793642E-3	2.8958730158730158E-3	1.93904761904762E-3	GAIN

BER




The comparison between BER performance for F=5.815GHz  at  different distances for QPSK

Graph 2


QPSK / F=5.815GHz
D=3	5	10	15	20	3.2004929158022583E-3	2.9433002877623268E-3	2.3464301348306215E-3	2.0084285160317456E-3	D=2	5	10	15	20	3.0206349206349202E-3	2.8358730158730152E-3	2.1357485629910876E-3	1.8203174603174603E-3	GAIN

BER





BER performance for D=2m at  different frequencies for QPSK.
Graph 3




BER performance for D=2m at  different frequencies for QPSK.
Graph 4



The comparison between BER performance for F=2.415GHz  at  different distances for 8PSK.
Graph 5


8PSK / F=2.415GHz
D=2	5	10	15	20	1.5957293855005883E-2	1.2387392142824902E-2	1.1505615544860747E-2	4.9098501654018288E-3	D=3	5	10	15	20	4.358571428571445E-2	3.4702848927351641E-2	2.7449999999999999E-2	1.5505451568012243E-2	GAIN

BER




The comparison between BER performance for F=5.815GHz  at  different distances for 8PSK
Graph 6


8PSK / F=5.815GHz
D=3	5	10	15	20	1.8647175262900613E-2	1.6306382320443399E-2	1.3636962176346116E-2	1.2424096729661599E-2	D=2	5	10	15	20	7.3350007413435312E-3	6.7996825396825378E-3	6.2206190388120206E-3	4.0688888888888875E-3	GAIN

BER





The comparison between BER performance for F=2.415GHz  at  different distances for 8PSK.
Graph 7




BER performance for D=3m at  different frequencies for 8PSK.
Graph 8







Inability to create a feedback system 

Shortage of work time

Constrains 
Simulink is the solution

























Power = 0.5 Po 
Power = 1.5 Po 
Power = 2 Po 



	SIGNAL LEVEL	QPSK	8-PSK
	0.5	16-20	-
	1	10-19	19-20
	1.5	6-16	16-20
	2	5-13	13-20

Comparison 






1



2



3



4



Measure Battery Available Power (BP)
Find Time 
Time = BP/Signal Level
Compare Time with To
Choose the best option 








Thanks for coming!
Time of Discussion
Please Be Calm until finished
Time of Dedication


image1.jpeg

image2.jpeg

image3.png

image4.png

image5.png

image6.jpeg

image7.png

image8.png

image9.jpeg

image10.png

image11.png

image12.png

image13.jpeg

image14.png

image15.png

image16.png

image17.png

image18.jpeg

image19.png

image20.png

image21.png

image22.png

image23.jpeg

image24.png

image25.png

image26.jpeg

image27.jpeg

image28.png

image29.png

image30.png

image31.png

image32.png

image33.png

image34.emf
E

b

/N

0

 (dB)

02468101214161820

B

E

R

10

-2

10

-1

10

0

QPSK

8PSK


image35.emf
E

b

/N

0

 (dB)

2468101214161820

B

E

R

10

-3

10

-2

10

-1

10

0

QPSK

8PSK


image36.emf
E

b

/N

0

 (dB)

02468101214161820

B

E

R

10

-3

10

-2

10

-1

10

0

QPSK

8PSK


image37.png

image38.png


/docProps/thumbnail.jpeg