. . 2012 ......... . . . : . . Declaration The work provided in this thesis, unless otherwise referenced, is the researcher's own work, and has not been submitted elsewhere for any other degree or qualification. : Student's Name : : Signature: : Date : : 1 2 4 5 6 6 7 7 : 9 : 10 : 29 33 : 36 37 37 37 38 39 41 42 : 44 45 : 60 61 67 69 70 73 b 1 38 2 40 3 46 4 53 5 53 6 54 7 ) ( 55 8 ) ( 56 9 57 10 57 11 58 12 58 13 ) ( 59 1 76 2 77 3 80 4 83 5 86 6 89 7 92 8 95 9 98 . )264 ( )12 ()81 ( )31 (%. )4 ( )12 ( )SPSS( : . . 2 . )1991(. ) 1994( . . 3 ) .2010( )1996(. ) 1994(. )26( " " )Dulancy 2001(. . )1993(. 4 ) 2006( " "" " . : - . - . - . - . - . - . 5 . . " 6 """" . . : 1- . 2- :) (. : : 1- 2- : ) ( 7 : 1- :- 2012 2013 . )12(" ". . 2- :- )2012- 2013(. ) ()15/8/2012 ( )15/9/2012.( 3- :-. " : - : ) 1991(. - : " " ) 2009(. - :(*). 8 - : ) 1991(. - : " ) 2009(. - : (*). - : (*). - : )A.B.C(*)(. - : "" *)(. 9 10 ... * )1490 1468( . )( ) 2009(. * . )776(. )40( " ." 11 ) 2009(. * )379( )393( . )1896(. ) 2009(. * . ) 2009(. 12 * )1896( . ) 2009(. * )1900 1950( )1988( . )2009 ( . "." 13 . )2009(. -1 -2 . -3 . ) 2009 ( ) ( 14 )1876( )1885( . 1890) ( 1893) ( . )1863 ( )1904 (. )1908 (. )1908 (2\ . )1909 (. )1909 ( . )1924 ( )1928(" ."" . 15 ") ()1960 ( . )23 ( . " "(sfa museum 1997). 1907 1934 (1980Manrice ). . Athlets "" Athlos" " Athlon " " " )2004 University of Pennsylvania.( )pier de copetain( " 16 ". ) pier de copetain( ) 1991(. Dulancy ) 2001 ( . )1980( . (1993). )1997 ( . )1963 ( . .... . . 17 : ) 1983(. )1997 ( . )1993 ( . )1980 ( . * )1991:( 1- . 2- . 3- . 4- . 5- . 6- . ) Smith and Stewart( 18 .)Smith and Stewart 1999( )1996 ( : 1- . 2- . 3- . : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . ) 1991(. 19 : 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. ) 1991(. . . ) 1992(. 20 * )2005( . : 1- . . . 2- . 3- . . 4- " 21 . " . 5- . . 6- . : . : . . : 1- : . 22 2- : ". 3- : ". 4- : . 5- : ) ( . 6- : ) 2006(. *:- 1- . 2- . 3- ..... 23 4- . 5- . 6- . 7- . 8- . 9- . 10- .) 2006( :- - . - . 24 - ". - . - . - . - . - . - " . ) 2006(. 25 )2006 (: 1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 6. ) (. 7. . 8. . 9. . 10. . 26 . 2010\2011 . : ::- - 37 . - : 15-21. 10-14. 10. . - : . 27 - : .... - :)16( . : - . - : "" : . : : 1- . 2- . 3- . 4- . 5- : . 28 6- . 7- :. 8- ) :(A . 9- :B . 10- . 11- )A15-21 B 10-14 C 10 .( : .... - . - " . - " ) 2012( . 29 :- - )2011( )24 ( .)18 ( )6 ( . . . - )2010( . - )2008( 30 -- )70 ( . - )2007( . )110(")10 25 75 ( : )23 1925(. )95.60(% . - )2005( . . )1800 ( . 31 . - )2004( " -" . )184 ( )42 ( )86 ( . - )2003( " ". )167 ("" . )6 ( ". 32 - )2000WILLIAMSON,( )2434 ( : . - ) 1999 ( " ". )388 (" . -)SHIN,1997(. )408 ( . - )1995( )368 (") 33 ( "" . : ) 1995 () 1999 ( ) 2005(. * . ) 1995 () 2003 ( ) 1997(. * . * ) 1999 ( ) 1997 ( ) 1995 () 2003.( 34 * . *. * . * . - : ) (. - . - ) .( - . - . 35 : - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . 36 - - - - - - - - - - 37 . . 2011/2012)264 ( )12 ()81( )31(% )1(. 38 )1( % 17 21.3 17 21.3 19 23.4 28 34 64 78.7 17 21.3 53 66 28 34 41 51 33 41 6 8 27 33 19 24 35 43 13 16 68 84 81 100 )65 ( )22( )18( 39 )25( ) ( . )16 ()Lawshe, 1975 ( )Lawshe, 1975( )1975, Lawshe( )2003, Pennington( )2003, Pennington()9751, Lawshe( )Lawshe, 1975( )Lawshe, 1975 (: =} ) /2({) //2( 40 : :. :. )6()3( )5( )16 ()15 ( )20( )51( )0.5 ()0.54- 0.69( )2 .( )2( 0.68 0.67 0.69 0.68 41 )Chronbach Alpha() 0.90( )0.95()0.88( )0.92( . : - . - . - . - )(SPSS. - . - . - . : 42 :: 1. :) .( 2. :).( 3. :).( 4. :) .( 5. :).( 6. :).( : . )(SPSS : 1- . 2- . 43 3- )Repeated MANOVA()Wilks Lambda(. 4- )Independent sample t-test( . 5- )One way ANOVA.( 6- )Scheffe.( 44 45 " " )(SPSS: :: : )2005( )5()6()7 (. 20 % 39.9 % 40 % 59.9 % 60 %- 79.9 % 80 %- 100 % 46 )3( 1. 1 4.43 0.74 88.51 2. 7 4.36 0.90 87.23 3. 5 4.32 0.86 86.38 4. 9 4.26 0.77 85.11 5. 11 4.21 0.75 84.26 6. 8 4.17 1.07 83.40 7. 3 4.17 0.92 83.40 8. 16 4.15 0.86 82.98 9. 2 4.13 0.80 82.55 10. 6 4.04 0.78 80.85 11. 10 4.04 0.91 80.85 12. 4 4.02 0.90 80.43 47 13. 14 3.81 1.31 76.17 14. 13 3.77 1.11 75.32 15. 12 3.72 1.16 74.47 16. 15 2.32 1.29 46.38 17. 17 4.23 0.97 84.55 18. 30 4.09 1.15 81.82 19. 28 4.09 1.11 81.82 20. 18 4.00 0.82 80.00 21. 31 3.95 1.00 79.09 22. 22 3.73 1.03 74.55 23. 23 3.68 0.89 73.64 24. 19 3.68 1.17 73.64 48 25. 26 3.68 1.04 73.64 26. 20 3.59 1.18 71.82 27. 27 3.59 1.18 71.82 28. 29 3.55 1.18 70.91 29. 21 3.55 0.96 70.91 30. 24 3.45 1.22 69.09 31. 25 3.27 1.16 65.45 32. 51 4.58 0.67 91.67 33. 34 4.42 0.67 88.33 34. 41 4.33 0.49 86.67 35. 36 4.33 0.78 86.67 36. 44 4.25 0.75 85.00 49 37. 42 4.25 0.87 85.00 38. 38 4.25 0.75 85.00 39. 40 4.17 0.94 83.33 40. 37 4.00 0.60 80.00 41. 49 4.00 0.60 80.00 42. 47 4.00 0.95 80.00 43. 33 4.00 0.43 80.00 44. 32 3.92 1.44 78.33 45. 46 3.92 0.90 78.33 46. 39 3.92 1.16 78.33 50 47. 48 3.83 0.94 76.67 48. 45 3.83 0.83 76.67 49. 50 3.75 0.87 75.00 50. 43 3.75 1.14 75.00 51. 35 3.75 1.06 75.00 4.08 0.61 81.60 3.74 0.81 74.85 4.09 0.62 81.81 3.98 0.69 79.6 )4.08 ()82 (% )1 ()4.43 ()89 (% 51 )15 ( )2.32 ()46 (% . ) 3.74 ()75 (% . )17 ( )4.23 ()85 (% )25 ( )3.27 ()65 (% . )4.09 ( )82 (% )51 ( 52 )4.58 ()92 (% )35 ()3.57 ( )75 (% . )3.98( )79.6(% ) ( ) ()( . : : 1. :" )=0.05( ." )One Way ANOVA( )5 ()6 (. 53 )4( 17 4.24 0.52 17 4.01 0.45 19 4.15 0.78 28 3.56 0.69 81 3.98 0.61 )5( F 835.492 4 208.87 341.507 42 1176.999 46 8.13 25.69** 0.000 *) = 0.05.( )=0.01( )Scheffe ()8 (. 54 )6( 0.23 0.09 0.68* -0.14 0.45* 0.59* *) =0.05( )=0.05( )=0.05( ) ( . 2. : " ) =0.05 ( ." )Independent sample t-test(. 55 )7( ) ( )=64( )=17( "" 4.17 0.67 3.22 0.75 2.81* 0.03 *) = 0.05.( ) =0.01( . 3. : " ) =0.05 ( ." )Independent sample t-test(. 56 )8( ) ( )=53( )=28( "" 4.16 0.71 3.45 0.63 2.67* 0.04 *) = 0.05.( )=0.01( . 4. : " )=0.05( ." )One Way ANOVA()10 ()11 (. 57 )9( 41 4.21 0.65 33 4.01 0.74 5 3.56 0.68 81 3.98 0.69 )10( F 42.470 3 14.16 621.541 77 664.011 80 8.07 1.75 0.09 *) = 0.05.( )=0.05( . 58 5. : " )=0.05( ." )One Way ANOVA()12 ()13 (. )11( 27 3.85 0.71 19 3.98 0.65 35 4.07 0.71 81 3.98 0.69 )12( F 39.487 3 13.16 471.240 77 510.727 80 6.12 2.15 0.07 *) = 0.05.( )=0.05( 59 . 6. : " )=0.05( ." )Independent sample t-test(. )13( ) (. ) =68( ) =13( "" 4.17 0.71 2.84 0.94 3.15* 0.02 * ) = 0.05.( )=0.05( 60 - - 61 . : : : ) (. )6 ( )4.08 ()82 (% . )1 ()4.43 ()89 (% )15 ( )2.32 ()46 (% . ) 62 2011() 2007() 2005() 2005( . )7( )3.74 ()75 (% . )1 ()4.23 ()85 (% .)9 ( )3.27 ()65 (% . )2007 ()2010 () 1999 () 2005( ) 2004.( 63 )8( )4.09 ()82 (% . )20 ()4.58 ()92 (% . )2007 ()2010 () 1999 () 2005.()4 ( )3.57()75 (% )2007 ()2010 ( )2005 ()2004(. :: ) : .( 64 . :" ) = 0.05( ." )9( )=0.05( )=0.05( ) ( . . . :" ) = 0.05( ." )11( ) = 0.01( . 65 . . )2007()2010 ()1999 ( )2005()2004.( . :" ) = 0.05( ." )12 ( ) = 0.01( . . )2007 ()2010 ()1999 ( )2005()2004.( . :" ) = 0.05( ." )13( ) = 0.05( 66 . .)2007 ( )2010 ()1999 ()2005()2004( . :" ) = 0.05( ." )14( )=0.05( )=0.05( . ) 2007()2005(. .:" ) = 0.05( ." 67 )18 ( ) = 0.05( . . : : . . . . 68 . . ) = 0.05( . ) = 0.05( . ) = 0.01( . ) = 0.05( . 69 : : 1- . 2- . 3- . 4- . 5- . 6- . 7- . 8- . 70 :: - . )2003.( " ." . ... -. )2010.( .-)(- -).2008.( . . ) .2009 .( .. -) .2005 .( . : . -) .1994 .(. : . - ).2004" .( -". . - .) 1980(. . . 71 - .) 1995(. . 9 61 79. - .) 1995(. . /. - )1997( . . )2006.(. . - .) 1992(. .1 . - )2003( . /. - .) 1991(. . 7 . - .) 1977(. . . - .)1993 .(. ... 640 642. ).2007.( . . 72 - .) 1997(. . . - .) 2005(. .. - ).1999" .( ." .. . . . - )1992( 1 . - )1995( /. - )()24()10(2949- 2968. - )2005.( . ) ( ) 4(1326. - ).2005 .( . -. 73 :: - Shin Seung, HO (1997), Professional Sport Team & Uraban Life: Degree of Commitment and Perceived Value Experience,University of Minnesota. - University of Pennsylvania, (2004), Ancient Olympics, From http://www.museum.upenn edu/new/Olympics/olympicintro. shtml. - DulancyS.(2001), Ethic in coaching, The Sport Journal Vol. 4.N3, Summer, 2001. - Manric, Goles worty, (1980), The Encyclopedia of Association Football, roper hale, London. - Smith & Stewart B, (1999) Professionalism the Management of Sport, Manchaster, England. - Park, Cummings, (1963), The Dictionary of Sport, The Ronald Press Company, New Yourk. - Wasserman, L. (2007). All of nonparametric statistics, Springer. - Pennington, D. (2003). Essential Personality. Arnold. - Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563 575. 74 - Williamson -Debra primeaux.(2000)."Dimension s of spectator identification associated with women's professional basketball game attendance'' degree:ed D.142. 75 76 )1( 1 . 2 . 3 4 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . )( 9 . 77 ) 2( \ ......................................... :. " " . )X ( . . 78 : : : A ( ) B ( ) C( ) ( ) : ( ) ( )( ) :5 ( )5 10 ( )10( ) : ( ) ( )( ) : ( )( ) : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 79 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 80 )3( \ ......................................... :. " " . )X ( . . 81 : : : ( ) ( ) ( )( ) : ) ( ) ( ) ( :5) (5 10 ) ( 10 ) ( : ( ) ( )( ) : ( )( ) : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 82 )4( \............................... : ........... " " . )X ( . . 83 : : :...................................................... : ) ( ) ( : ( )( ) : ( ) ( )( ) : ( ) ( ) ( ) :3 ( )3- 5 ( )5( ) : ( )( ) : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 84 13 14 15 16 85 )5( :- " " . )X ( . . 86 : : : : :...................................................... : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 87 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 88 )6 ( :- " " . )X ( . . 89 : : : : :...................................................... : : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 90 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 91 )7( :- " " . )X ( . . 92 : : :...................................................... : : : :...................................................... : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 93 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 94 )7( :- " " . )X ( . . 95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 96 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 97 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 98 )9( . . : : )10953943 (" " . : :15/8/ 2012 ....:...................... An- Najah National University Faculty of Graduate Studies The contribution professionalism in developing the level of soccer game in west bank Prepared by Mohammad Omar Shawahny Supervised by Dr. Mahmoud Al Atrash This Thesis is Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Physical Education Faculty of Graduate Studies, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine 2012 B The contribution professionalism in developing the level of soccer game in west bank By Mohammad Omar Shawahny Supervised by Dr. Mahmoud Al Atrash Abstract This study aims at identifying the Contribution of Professionalism in Developing the Level of Soccer Game in West Bank. The researcher adopted the descriptive analytical methodology due to its suitability in this field of studies, the study sample was composed of (81) individual, which were randomly selected, the sample candidate of (47) player in four main clubs, (22) judges, (12) trainer of the same clubs, the percentage reached of 58% of the total sample while the judges were around 27%, at the same time players consisted of 15% of the total sample. The sample chosen were represented of 12 clubs, after data collection, the data were analyzed using the SPSS , the main results the study reached were that professionalism participated in improving the level of soccer game in the west bank from the perception of players, trainers and judges, moreover, there were a positive relationship between professionalism and performance level for the main teams in the Palestinian league of professional soccer game, this indicated the need of the athletic communist for professionalism. Finally, the researcher recommends that there is a need to establish sport facilities and distributed among the professionalism leagues to guarantee the needed infrastructure in preparing qualified cadre of trainers, judges, C and players to reached the level of professionalism in soccer games, and also the importance of paying attention to the main clubs an increase their level to investment companies and expand the concept of professional to include trainers and judges. This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.win2pdf.com. The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only. This page will not be added after purchasing Win2PDF. http://www.win2pdf.com