Under supervision of: Dr.Ibrahim Arman. Prepared by: Rania Fawzi Daraghmeh. Layth Ibrahim Obeid. Du'a Mohammad Hotaree. Spring 2022. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF JERUSALEM TWIN TOWERS GRADUATION PROJECT-2 AN-NAJAH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Faculty of Engineering DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRAINS The complexity of the project plans. Modeling the structure was not easy. Various and continuous changes of levels and structural elements of each story. Different zones were taken in the computation of loads due to the multiple usages for each story. Run time was consuming, it takes more than 3 hours. Project Outline CHAPTER 1 Introduction. CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 Preliminary Design. Three Dimensional Modeling. Structural Design. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION. OUTLINE PROJECT PLANS AND SITE LOCATION FLOORS HEIGHTS, AREAS AND USAGES CODES AND STANDARDS SOFTWARE PROGRAMS MATERIALS GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS LOADS (GRAVITY AND LATERAL LOADS) LOAD COMBINATIONS CH1:INTRODUCTION +783m AMSL of the north. Location: Jerusalem city –Palestine. Elevation of the site. +777m AMSL of the south. SITE LOCATION CH1:INTRODUCTION NORTHERN FACADE CH1:INTRODUCTION FLOORS USAGE Floor NO. Area of each tower Total area Height m -3 - 2704.4 4.3 -2 - 2704.4 3 -1 - 2704.4 4.4 1 (Ground floor) - 2704.4 3.85 2 - 2349 3.15 3 - 2107.7 3.15 4 - 17 595.5 1191 3.15 18 595.5 1191 3.3 19, 20 595.5 1191 3.5 21 595.5 1191 2.95 22 (Roof) 595.5 1191 2.5 CH1:INTRODUCTION FLOORS AREAS AND HEIGHTS CH1:INTRODUCTION PROJECT PLAN OF FLOOR - 02 CH1:INTRODUCTION SECTION VIEW CH1:INTRODUCTION PROJECT PLAN OF FLOOR 04: ASCE 7-10 IBC 2018 ACI 318-14 ASTM 2016 CODES AND STANDARDS: LOADS COMPUTATIONS LOADS COMPUTATIONS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS JORDANIAN CODE FOR LOADS – 2006 ONLY FOR SNOW LOAD CH1:INTRODUCTION ETABS 2016 AUTOCAD 2019 MICROSOFT OFFICE 2020 1 2 3 CH1:INTRODUCTION SOFTWARE PROGRAMS: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN THE MODEL DRAWING PROGRAM. PREPARING REPORTS & TABLES Structural element Concrete Type fcʹ (MPa) Walls, columns and footings B500 40 Beams, slabs and stairs B400 32 Yield strength (Fy) 420 MPa Ultimate strength (fu) 620 MPa Steel grade 60 Modulus of elasticity (Es) 200 GPa CONCRETE A. STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS MATERIALS: REINFORCEMENT STEEL CH1:INTRODUCTION MATERIALS Material Unit weight γ (Kn/m^3) Masonry stone 26.5 Cement Mortar & Plaster 23 Partition blocks 15 Filling material aggregate 18 Glass 25 Aluminum 26 Porcelain tiles 24 Marble tiles 27 B. NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS MATERIALS: CH1:INTRODUCTION MATERIALS CH1:INTRODUCTION SOIL INVESTIGATION The characterization of soil is Marl soil with equal levels of strength and density of limestone. The soil is reported to be "TYPE C" . The foundation of the tower will be made using mat foundation. The bearing capacity equals 500KN/m . 2 K coefficient = 0.35 up to a depth of 3m ,and k=0.15 below that depth. Surcharge load=20KN/m . 2 CH1:INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS Different elements will be represented as lines and areas in the program. The structure is analyzed and designed for the critical load cases The foundation of the tower will be mat foundation. The supports to the model are fixed. The wind and rains loads will not be the dominant load case as the seismic forces are larger. LOADS CH1:INTRODUCTION Live Load (KN/) Occupancy 5 Lobbies 3 Apartments 5 Balconies 3 Garage (Passenger vehicle only) 5 Ramp 6 Storage Rooms (light) 5 Gardens 15 Trash room 12 Generator 5 Roof 5 Stairs A.GRAVITY LOADS: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 1.Dead load: self weigh of the struture 2.Live loads: According to ASCE7-16 code. A.GRAVITY LOADS: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 3.Super imposed loads on slabs: S = 5.52 KN/m . DL partition A.GRAVITY LOADS: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 3.Super imposed loads on slabs: S = 5.52 KN/m . DL partition A.GRAVITY LOADS: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 3. Super imposed dead loads on slabs. Material Masonry stone Aluminum Glass Block Plain concrete Unit weight (KN/m3) 26.5 26 25 15 23 Thickness (cm) 5 0.2 0.4 10 5 A.GRAVITY LOADS: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 3. Super imposed dead loads on exterior walls. Structure Elevation AMSL (h) in meters Site Snow Load (S_0) (KN/m2) h < 250 m 0 250 < h < 500 (h-250)/800 500 < h < 1500 (h-400)/320 A.GRAVITY LOADS: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 4. Snow load: B. Temperature load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS Temperature load has been used rather than using of expansion joint. Temperature load equals to 15 °C due to the average change of the temperature during the day. C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 1.Earthquake load: From maps: Spectral response acceleration: = 0.38g , = 0.1g. Site coefficient: =1.7, =1.2. Spectral acceleration: = × =0.456. = × =0.17. C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 1.Earthquake load: The design spectral acceleration parameters: =𝑆_𝑀𝑆=0.456. = =0.17. C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 1.Earthquake load: Risk category (III). (ASCE 7-16). Importance factor () = 1.25. (ASCE 7-16). Seismic design category (SDC) → C. (ASCE 7-16). Redundancy factor (ρ) = 1.0. (ASCE 7-16). C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 1.Earthquake load: Seismic forces resisting system: Bearing wall system-ordinary reinforced concrete shear wall. Response modification coefficient (R) = 4. Over-strength factor () = 2.5. Deflection amplification factor () = 4. C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 1.Earthquake load: C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 2. Soil load: The soil report has specified the following points: K = 0.35 up to depth 3m. K = 0.15 below 3m. Surcharge load = 20 KN/. 𝛾 = 20 KN/. Soil lateral pressure: P = 𝛾 × 𝐻 × Soil seismic load: ∆𝑃 = 0.4 × × 𝛾 × 𝐻𝑏 = = 0.456. = 2.5 = 0.182. C. LATERAL load: CH1:INTRODUCTION LOADS 2. Soil load: = + Load Combination: Service load combinations: 1. D + F + H + 0.75T. 2. D + L + F + H + 0.75T. 3. D + + F + H + 0.75T. 4. D + S + F + H + 0.75T. 5. 1.0 D + 0.7 + 0.7 + F + H + 0.75T. 6. 1.0 D + 0.525 + 0.525 + 0.75 L + F + H + 0.75T. 7. 0.6 D – 0.7 + 0.7 + 0.6F + 0.75T. Load Combination: Strength design combination. 1. 1.4 D + 1.4 F + 1.6H + T. 2. 1.2 D + 1.6 L + 0.5 +1.2 F + 1.6H + T. 3. 1.2 D + 1.6 L + 0.5 S +1.2 F + 1.6H + T. 4. 1.2 D + 1.6 + L + 1.2F + 1.6H + T. 5. 1.2 D + 1.6 S + L +1.2 F + 1.6H + T. 6. 1.2 D + + + L + 0.2S + 1.2F + 1.6H + T. 7. 0.9 D –+ + 0.9F + 1.6H + T. CHAPTER 2: Preliminary Design. Slab structural system. Preliminary slab thickness. Preliminary dimensions of columns and walls. CH2:Preliminary Design. Slab preliminary design: Slab type is flat slab. 36 CH2:Preliminary Design. Floor -02: 37 CH2:Preliminary Design. Floor 04: 38 CH2:Preliminary Design. Slab preliminary design: Floor Level (m) Preliminary slab depth (mm) -2 -7.40 350mm -8.40 450mm Under-ramp -7.40 1000mm -1 -5.25 450mm   -4.40 350mm 01( GF) -2.5 300mm   -1.4 300mm   0.00 300mm 02 +2.80 350mm   +3.70 350mm 03 +5.85 350mm   +6.85 350mm 04 - 21 +10.0 to +70 350mm 39 CH2:Preliminary Design. Walls and columns preliminary dimensions: Structural element Preliminary dimensions Walls Thickness = 300mm Circular columns R = 400mm Square columns 700*700 40 CHAPTER 3: Three – Dimensional Analysis and Design. Structural modeling of the building. Verification of the structural analysis. Deflection computations. Slab shear check. Structural irregularity. Effect of P-delta. Structural Modeling. Section modifiers for flexure and torsion: Slab modifiers = 0.25. Beams modifiers = 0.35. Wall modifiers = 0.7. Columns modifiers = 0.7. Ramp and stairs modifiers = 0.001. Load Definition: Load Definition: Parameters of seismic forces in X and Y direction. The values of SS, S1 and site class coefficient were changed in both directions until the values of SDS and SD1 reached the previously calculated values. Load Definition: Functions: Response Spectrum function was defined in ETABS software based on ASCE 7-10 code. Masses: The total seismic load (w) includes: 100% from dead loads and superimposed dead loads, in addition to 25% from live loads. Pier and spandrel labeling: Walls must be assigned to pier or spandrel label before obtaining either output forces or design. Piers will report the forces and preform the design at the top and bottom of each object for each story. Spandrel label on the other hand output the forces and the design ate the left and right ends of the object. Verification of structural analysis: 1. Compatibility check: Verification of structural analysis: 2. Equilibrium check: Load Manual value (KN) Etabs value (KN) Difference % Dead 669,965.15 674,199.8542 0.63 Live 128,650.78 128,695.9069 0.04 Snow 1055.73 1039.2415 1.56 Super imposed (stone) 37,041.20 37,122.901 0.22 Super imposed (slab) 159,380.3 159,417.9765 0.02 50 Verification of structural analysis: 1st -ve moment =-3.384KN.m. +ve moment= +2.64KN.m. (-29.93,10.23,25.90) (-27.70,10.23,25.90) 3. Stress – strain check 51 Verification of structural analysis: 3. Stress – strain check 52 4. Stress – strain check Verification of structural analysis: 4. Deflection check: Verification of structural analysis: Verification of structural analysis: 5. Slab shear check: 55 Verification of structural analysis: 6. Punching shear check : 56 Verification of structural analysis: 6. Punching shear check : 57 Upper portion : Two staged – Analysis and Design: 1. 2. Lower portion : Verification of structural analysis: Principles of running the analysis: A. Mass participation ratio in each direction at least 90%. This condition was fulfilled in the upper portion. Note: In the lower portion the equivalent static method was implemented. Case Mode Period UX UY Sum UX Sum UY sec Modal 34 0.065 0 3.84E-06 0.9234 0.9118 B. Scaling of forces: If equivalent statict base shear value (V) is larger than response spectrum base shear value(Vt) , the forces shall be multiplied by 𝑉/𝑉𝑡 . Verification of structural analysis: Principles of running the analysis: C. Period check for the lower portion: D. Verification of structural analysis: 7. Drift check: 61 Verification of structural analysis: 8. P – Delta effect: 62 Verification of structural analysis: 9. Horizontal structural irregularities: 63 Verification of structural analysis: 10. Vertical structural irregularities: 64 Verification of structural analysis: Seismic force (Base Shear): A. Upper portion: Weight of structure = 287692.6 KN. 65 Verification of structural analysis: Seismic force (Base Shear): B. Lower portion: Weight of structure = 819906.1KN. 66 Verification of structural analysis: Seismic force (Base Shear): A. Base shear results for the upper portion: Base shear Manual (KN) Etabs (KN) % Difference Vx 14528.2 14528.031 0.001182 Vy 23298.28 23294.463 0.016367 A. Base shear results for the lower portion: Base shear Manual (KN) Etabs (KN) % Difference Vx 116153.641 111954.205 3.61 Vy 116836.6228 112715.709 3.52 Base shear Manual (KN) Etabs (KN) % Difference Vx 14528.2 14528.031 0.001182 Vy 23298.28 23294.463 0.016367 67 Verification of structural analysis: Seismic force distribution for the upper portion X- direction: 68 Structural Design. CHAPTER 4: Structural Design. Design of slabs. Design of columns. Design of walls. Design of footings. Design of stairs. Design of ramp. Design of non-structural elements. Design of slabs: Design of slabs: Design of slabs: Reinforcement in X-Direction of story 16 of the upper portion “left side” Design of slabs: Reinforcement in Y-Direction of story 16 of the upper portion “left side” Design of slabs: Reinforcement of punching shear in story -1: Design of Diaphragm: Diaphragm: Design of Diaphragm: Diaphragm: Design of Diaphragm: Diaphragm: Section cuts with 1 meter increments. Design of Diaphragm: Diaphragm: Design of Diaphragm: Diaphragm: shear check: 80 Design of Collector Collector elements: 1. Shall be provided that are capable to transfer the seismic forces. 2. they are affected with tension and compression forces (F11 & F22). Collector: 81 Design of Collector Points where maximum values of tension and compression Collector: 82 Design of Collector Collector: 83 Design of Collector Collector: 84 Design of Walls: Design of Walls: Flexural verification: Bressler’s Reciprocal load method shall be applied to verify the wall section for the biaxial moments. CSI SAP 2000 was used to obtain the moment – axial interaction diagram (P-M-M). Design of Walls: 87 P-M3 0 8326.1782999999905 13671.731000000009 17529.902999999998 19994.238000000001 21252.953000000001 23395.945000000018 24703.796999999999 20211.778999999999 14299.538 0 36034.400000000001 36034.400000000001 34194.9 29111.420000000009 23859.34 18319.460000000017 17025.240000000005 15028.08 9866.2999999999902 4759.91 -4939.1567000000014 Design of Walls: 88 P-M2 0 1428.2447 2409.8474000000001 3052.3577000000023 3359.7903000000001 3347.1235000000001 3622.8825000000002 3649.1843999999987 2675.6320000000001 1399.7909 0 36034.40000000 0001 36034.400000000001 34036.5 28679.5 23115.29 17145.490000000005 15033.26 11956.240000000009 6052.81 210.47489999999999 -4939.1567000000023 Design of Walls: Design of Walls: Flexural verification: Design of Walls: Design of Walls: Design of Spandrel: Design of Spandrel: Design of Spandrel: Design of Spandrel: Design of Spandrel: Design of Spandrel: m 98 Design of Spandrel: 99 Design of Mat Foundation: Design of Mat Foundation: 101 Design of Mat Foundation: 102 Design of columns: Column C15 in story3 was chosen to be verified and designed : Length= 2.15m. Diameter= 650mm. Design of columns: Interaction diagram at 0 degrees. Mu3 = -55.93 KN.m → ØPn3 = 6480 KN. P-M 0 174.82410000000004 358.74059999999969 504.55529999999999 585.09119999999996 593.17950000000053 624.39009999999996 598.8288 400.90789999999993 158.60850000000002 0 6480.0959000000003 6480.0959000000003 6480.0959000000003 5382.8311000000003 4133.3828000000003 2782.2759999999998 2200.9895999999999 1464.8202999999999 374.20649999999966 -664.84689999999932 -1227.5387000000001 Design of columns: Interaction diagram at 90 degrees. Mu2 = -53.73 KN.m → ØPn2 = 6480 KN. (positive values are compression). 105 Design of columns: Column C15 in story3 was chosen to be verified and designed : 106 Design of columns: Column C15 in story3 was chosen to be verified and designed : 107 Design of Stairs: Design of Stairs: Design of Stairs: Design of Stairs: 111 Design of Stairs: Design of Ramps: 113 Design of Ramps: 114 Design of Ramps: 115 Design of Ramps: 116 Design of Ramps: 117 Design of Ramps: 118 Design of Ramps: 119 Design of Ramps: 120 Design of Ramps: 121 CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements:تعدييييييييييل CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements: CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements: CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements: Steel angle: CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements:تعدييييييييييل CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements: CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements: Design of partition wall: CHAPTER 2 Design of non-Structural elements: Design of partition wall: Thank you for listening.. Any questions? image1.png image2.svg image3.png image4.png image5.svg image6.png image7.png image8.svg image9.png image10.svg image11.png image12.svg image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.svg image17.jpeg image18.png image19.svg image20.png image21.svg image140.png image22.jpeg image23.png image24.svg image25.png image26.jpeg image27.png image28.svg image29.png image21.png image30.png image31.png image32.png image33.png image34.jpeg image35.png image36.png image37.png image38.png image39.png image40.png image41.png image42.png image43.png image44.png image49.png image45.png image46.png image47.png image48.png image50.png image420.png image51.png image52.png image53.png image54.png image55.png image56.png image57.png image58.png image59.png image60.png image61.png image62.png image63.png image65.png image64.png image66.png image67.png image68.png image70.png image69.png image72.png image71.png image73.png image74.jpeg image75.jpeg image76.png image77.png image78.png image79.png image80.png image82.png image81.png image83.png image84.png image85.png image86.png image87.png image88.png image89.png image90.jpeg image91.png image92.png image93.png image94.png image95.jpeg image96.jpeg image97.jpeg image98.jpeg image99.png image100.png image101.png image102.png image103.png image104.png image105.png image106.png image107.png image108.png image109.png image110.png image111.png image112.png image113.png image114.png image115.png image116.png image117.png image118.png image119.svg image120.png image121.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent2_Fill { fill:#C0504D; } .MsftOfcThm_MainDark1_Stroke { stroke:#000000; } image122.png image123.png image124.jpeg image125.png image130.png image131.png image132.png image133.png image134.png image135.jpeg image136.png image137.png image138.png image139.png image141.png image142.png image143.png image144.png image145.png image146.png image147.png image148.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent2_Fill { fill:#C0504D; } .MsftOfcThm_MainDark1_Stroke { stroke:#000000; } image149.png image150.png image151.png image152.png image153.png image154.png image155.png image156.svg .MsftOfcThm_MainLight1_Fill { fill:#FFFFFF; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent2_Stroke { stroke:#C0504D; } image157.png image158.png image159.png image160.png image161.png image162.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent2_Fill { fill:#C0504D; } .MsftOfcThm_MainDark1_Stroke { stroke:#000000; } image163.png image164.png image165.png image166.png image167.png image168.png image169.png image170.png image171.png image172.png image173.png image174.png image175.png image176.png image177.png image178.png image179.png image180.png image181.png image182.png image183.png image184.png image185.png image186.png image187.png image188.png image189.png image190.png image191.png image192.png image193.png image194.png image195.png image196.png image197.png image198.png image199.png image200.png image201.png image202.png image203.png image204.png image205.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent2_Fill { fill:#C0504D; } .MsftOfcThm_MainDark1_Stroke { stroke:#000000; }